• ɐɥO@lemmy.ohaa.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The internet is getting as bad as radio.

    Lemmy kinda feels like the 2000’s internet and I love it

    edit: formatting

        • neutron@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Let’s not romanticize the old web too much. It had its problems too:

          • Half-done html pages with under_construction.gif or cliparts copypasted from Word. Some went through multiple editors like Frontpage and Dreamweaver which ended up producing spaghetti HTML.

          • Autoplaying midi from songs probably from Limp Bizkit, Metallica, Blink 182, etc. Did I mention that MIDI volumes count as separate from normal ‘Media’ volumes, and were often cranked to the MAX?

          • It was a time when HTML/CSS/JS would chaotically intertwine with proprietary plugins like Flash and ActiveX. “Best viewed from Internet Explorer at 800x600” was a thing. Readability? Accessibility? Forget about it.

          • You paid by minute on dial-up connection until ADSL appeared. Good luck trying to download that tenchi_muyo_hentai.jpg.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That was more the 90s - the time of things like Geocities - than the 2000s.

            By the 2000s there had already been one Internet Boom & Bust and things on the Internet were way more comercialized than is earlier times of handmade sites, pre-CSS webpages and ActiveX components.

        • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Same
          Hello fellow… are we considered as gen-zedders or tail end millennials? Because I have friends born in 97 and they are definitely not Gen Z

          • penguin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Millennials, according to Wikipedia,

            The generation typically being defined as people born from 1981 to 1996

            After that is Gen Z and Gen Alpha starts somewhere around 2010.

            So 1997 would be an older Gen Z

            • silverbax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That generational ‘designation’ has been changed so many times it’s not credible.

              Gen X was originally they ‘children of the baby boomers’. If someone was born in 1981, they were young Gen X for most of their life, now they are told they are ‘Millennials’

          • whileloop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I grew up around cousins who were all older than me, so I think I was influenced more by 90s culture than most of my peers. I think you and I are the awkward in-between.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            1997 is a funny birthyear 😀 on one hand you grow up in “traditionell way” and thus you understand older folks who don’t understand new slang but on the other hand you understand the digital natives who grow up with all that attention grabbing BS.

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The older you get, the more you see generational cuttoffs as a load of bullshit.

      • skyspydude1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine content creation that was done purely for the fun of creating content and sharing info, albeit with literally zero hope of receiving any money. Better in some ways, worse in others.

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, I’d be careful with this sentiment. A significant part of internet’s decline comes from people who think of themselves as too smart and rationalize their own nonsense.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It makes me wonder tho: is Lemmy sustainable? I never want to get invested in something like Reddit again when there’s no proper and respectful end game for all the communities that make up their lifeblood.

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In my experience all good things on the internet come to an end. Usually when big money starts meddling.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup and hopefully only the beginning. The fediverse is like a better internet without big tech.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. I’m noticing when things get too big, undesirables start creeping in.

      ‘Undesirable’ in this sense would be people with more money than sense and incredibly low standards for what they spend it on. They are the kinds that are proud to be ripped off and businesses will cater to them over smarter folk.