• acastcandream@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    5 years of OS support

    If I’m going to go through the hassle of abandoning all the bells, whistles, and conveniences of major smart phone makers, I would hope to get a little more than just 5 years on my OS. The entire impetus for my getting one of these is the ability to replace failing parts and upgrade it as I go. What’s the point if it’s just going to stop being updated?

    I have an iPhone currently going on year 4. Replaced the battery once for $100. Got it for $700. I just don’t see why I should make the swap now. OS/security isn’t enough of a difference, price isn’t enough of a difference. Cameras on iPhone are better.

    All that fairphone offers me that I really want is better control and privacy, which is important to me, but I was expecting a little more on other fronts. 

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are offering a minimum of 8 years of software support. 5 years is the warranty. I’m not sure why OP wrote that, it’s not what was announced.

      • lol3droflxp@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. It’s 8 apparently
        2. 5 years is as long as most phones that I used last so there would be no point to buy it
        • acastcandream@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          8 years of security not OS support.

          I don’t want a phone like most phones for $800USD. Especially one that’s slower, has a worse camera, etc. It needs either more impressive features or to be $200 cheaper. Otherwise why bother? Ultimately this boils down to price and features if they want to actually break into the market. The repair-ability alone isn’t enough.

          • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair wages for the people making the phone is also a selling point of this phone. It’s not just about repairability.

            That said I’m also not writing this from a Fairphone, because the price is too high for me.

          • hascat@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            slower

            How fast do you need your phone to be for sending messages, streaming video, or browsing the web? Every phone made in the last decade can do these things.

          • Square Singer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The high price actually cancels the point of the repairability. I can get a similar phone for easily €400-500 less. If I budget that extra price for repairs, I can get the battery and screen replaced quite a few times.

            I say that as an FP4 owner, who did the same calculation mistake there.

        • gelberhut@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          According to Fairphone “We plan at least 5 Android OS version updates after Android 13”.

      • gelberhut@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Samsung offers 4 years of os updates for many phones and watches. And news reported that pixel 8 will have better.

        If I recall correctly, Xiaomi recently declared the same for some of their phones.

        • ripcord@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          4 years including security updates though right? If that’s the flcase then fairphone’s doing 8 years.

          • gelberhut@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            No really. Samsung offers 4 years of os updates and 5 years of security updates. Samsung releases os updates really fast, so 5 years basically means 5 os versions.

            Fairhone declares 5 os versions and 8 years of software support. Fairphone users here mentioned that fairphone is very slow with updates, so it could happen that 5 os versions really will take 8 years. If Fairphone will keep same cadence as Samsung, its 5 os versions can be coverted into 5 years.

            But we have a bit of apples vs oranges here.

            I personally find samsung’s policy good enough for majority of users. I expect that I will upgrade my phone every 3 - 5 years for different unpredictable today reasons anyway.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s a clear trajectory where this is heading. From 2027 the EU will enforce replaceable batteries and it looks like some other markets might follow. Software support duration is increasing a lot as well.

          I wouldn’t be surprised if you’d get most of the Fairphone’s benefits on a regular Samsung in a few years.

          • gelberhut@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, very realistic scenario. TBF, I cannot remember if I ever upgraded a phone due to the battery issuses.

            So, for me personally, replaceable battery is not a significant benefit.

      • M_Djallo@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually in the past they updated their software even past the support from qualcomm, rewriting by themselves what was needed to allow and old chipset to run newer android version

        Source

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, well, they are just doing what custom ROM makers have been doing for a decade and a half.

          My old Droid 4 was also EOL after Android 4.1. Custom ROM makers pushed this up to Android 7.1 by ignoring the parts (e.g. the Kernel) that they couldn’t update.

      • acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fair enough. I should probably augment my tone a little bit. I understand that they are not doing this out of malice. But at the end of the day, it hurts the sale.  I’m not sure what the solution is.

        I mean the performance and the price just kind of steers me away. There isn’t enough going for this thing that makes me want to make the swap and change all of my systems I currently have in place. Especially when I can get objectively better hardware for the same price. 

        • Uranium3006@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The price is also higher because they use fair trade gold and whatnot. Given the mission to clean up the electronics industry it’s plesently suprising it doesn’t cost more