• Daveyborn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    WW1 set the stage for WW2 to be fair. 2 as we know it wouldn’t have happened without 1.

      • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I do think he confused 1 and 2 when he wrote that statement though. I actually think 2 wouldn’t have happened at all without the effects of 1.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And the Wars of the Roses (amongst other things) set the stage for WW1. That’s just cause and effect, not some sort of profundity.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Okay, but that’s all of history. One thing leads to another. The problem is, you can’t say what would have happened if things went differently.

          Would there have been no Nazi party if World War I never happened? Was Hitler’s rise to power in part due to his experiences in World War I and the economic crisis Germany was put in due, in part, to World War I? We have no way of knowing.

          Maybe if Victoria and Albert hadn’t married, World War I would still have happened, but been even worse because there would have been even greater enmity between the British and the Germans. We can’t know. The best we can do is write speculative fiction.

          • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Good thing I wasn’t grabbing all of history in my statement then, just 2 plot points.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Did you not read past the first paragraph? Everything else I wrote was about WWI and WWII. I literally talked about Hitler.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Okay, then why did you say:

                  Good thing I wasn’t grabbing all of history in my statement then, just 2 plot points.

                  When I was literally discussing those two plot points?

                  I’ll paste what I said again. Maybe you’ll have a legitimate response to it?

                  Would there have been no Nazi party if World War I never happened? Was Hitler’s rise to power in part due to his experiences in World War I and the economic crisis Germany was put in due, in part, to World War I? We have no way of knowing.

                  Maybe if Victoria and Albert hadn’t married, World War I would still have happened, but been even worse because there would have been even greater enmity between the British and the Germans. We can’t know. The best we can do is write speculative fiction.

                  • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Because you said that’s “all of history”, it’s not like I’m trying to link Christopher Columbus to 9/11 here. I even stated the dude mixed the wars up in another comment thread.