• mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Current panel efficiency is at roughly 22%. A 34% efficient panel would increase current solar generation to 133% just by replacing current panels. That’s much easier then building new solar generation plants. This would move the “total energy produced Earth by solar” amount from the current 5.5% to 7.35%

    That’s a pretty stunning improvement for a comparably easy lift.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Oh no doubt it’s a massive improvement. It’s just we can see even better numbers and for cheaper once we crack the materials and lithographic constraints of rectenna diode construction. Mass production of those babies would be revolutionary in terms of solar energy. It’d straight up outcompete fossil and nuclear even considering having to build energy storage. Hell it’d be revolutionary even if we make them just for the infrared wavelength.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9320463/

      • piper11@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Did not know that rectenna panels could harvest infrared radiation at night. Interesting technology

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The longevity numbers on these are abysmal, though. Like nearly useless after a year.

      I’m not interested in hearing about perovskites breaking efficiency records when the longevity issue isn’t solved.