• Badass_panda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It takes all of three minutes to click through to the court order here. All three companies do significant business in the US, but the money to buy the oil was US dollars, and came from Oaktree Capital which is based in Los Angeles.

    Which is (and this might be a shocker) in the USA.

      • Badass_panda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        your arguing US law. I’m arguing international. They are not the same.

        No shit… these companies operate in the US, which makes US law applicable to them.

        • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, what you’re saying is, international law should be superceded by domestic law?

          • Badass_panda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s how it normally works, yes… particularly if the country in question is not a signatory to the ‘international law’ in question.

              • Badass_panda@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That they can issue court orders to companies that do business in their territory?

                They … they know…

                • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That domestic policy supercedes international law? That’s literally been the entire argument for sanctions against China: that their domestic policy violates international law and that under the rules-based international order someone needs to do something about it.

                  • Badass_panda@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sorry I am finding it very difficult to follow your argument.

                    Can you explain what “international law” you believe US sanctions to have broken?