• HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    One commits it, one supplies arms to a third being investigated for it (we at confirmed yet?). Its murder vs manslaughter or association to murder.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Except in this case there’s no murder. China is accused of reducing birth rates, not mass killing. Regardless of whether the accusation is true, any serious person can see there’s a very clear difference.

      Also, you can definitely be charged with murder if you were critical in providing the murder weapon and facilitating the murder.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Every other genocide in history has been accompanied by mass killing and mass detention and mass displacement. That’s what makes genocide the crime of crimes. It’s a horror with no parallel.

          I think there’s a serious problem if you can have a bloodless genocide by technicality.