• 4vgj0e@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I find it insane when “tech bros” and AI researchers at major tech companies try to justify the wasting of resources (like water and electricity) in order to achieve “AGI” or whatever the fuck that means in their wildest fantasies.

    These companies have no accountability for the shit that they do and consistently ignore all the consequences their actions will cause for years down the road.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s research. Most of it never pans out, so a lot of it is “wasteful”. But if we didn’t experiment, we wouldn’t find the things that do work.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most of the entire AI economy isn’t even research. It’s just grift. Slapping a label on ChatGPT and saying you’re an AI company. It’s hustlers trying to make a quick buck from easy venture capital money.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can probably say the same about all fields, even those that have formal protections and regulations. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t people that have PhD’s in the field and are trying to improve it for the better.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure but typically that’s a small part of the field. With AI it’s a majority, that’s the difference.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              No, it is the majority in every field.

              Specialists are always in the minority, that is like part of their definition.

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Is it really a grift when you are selling possible value to an investor who would make money from possible value?

          As in, there is no lie, investors know it’s a gamble and are just looking for the gamble that everyone else bets on, not that it l would provide real value.

      • 4vgj0e@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree, but these researchers/scientists should be more mindful about the resources they use up in order to generate the computational power necessary to carry out their experiments. AI is good when it gets utilized to achieve a specific task, but funneling a lot of money and research towards general purpose AI just seems wasteful.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think I’ve heard a lot of actual research in the AI area not connected to machine learning (which may be just one component, not really necessary at that).

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What’s funny is that we already have general intelligence in billions of brains. What tech bros want is a general intelligence slave.