• acutfjg@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Were they in public forums and sites like stack overflow and GitHub where they wanted people to use and share their code?

      • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Stable Diffusion uses a dataset from Common Crawl, which pulled art from public websites that allowed them to do so. DeviantArt and ArtStation allowed this, without exception, until recently.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Humans using past work to improve, iterate, and further contribute themselves is not the same as a program throwing any and all art into the machine learning blender to regurgitate “art” whenever its button is pushed. Not only does it not add anything to the progress of art, it erases the identity of the past it consumed, all for the blind pursuit of profit.

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah tell me who invented the word ‘regurgitate’ without googling it. Cause the its historical identity is important right?

        Or how bout who first created the internet?

        Its ok if you dont know, this is how humans work, on the backs of giants

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Me not knowing everything doesn’t mean it isn’t known or knowable. Also, there’s a difference between things naturally falling into obscurity over time and context being removed forcefully.

          • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And then there’s when its too difficult to upkeep them, exactly like how you can’t know everything.

            We probably ain’t gonna stop innovation, so we mine as well roll with it (especially when its doing a great job redistributing previously expensive assets)

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              If it’s “too difficult” to manage, that may be a sign it shouldn’t just be let loose without critique. Also, innovation is not inherently good and “rolling with it” is just negligent.