• breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      29 days ago

      rumour being a lot of legacy software checked

      if(os_name.startsWith(“Windows 9”)) …
      

      which would break

    • Matty_r@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      29 days ago

      Yep. Because windows 95 and 98 exist, and there is a bunch of software which would do a check for the operating system version you were running with something like, if the operating system name starts with “Windows 9” etc

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      29 days ago

      I have heard, but never in any way verified, that there was code that tried to identify whether you were running 95 or 98 by looking for a version starting with 9. If true, it would mean some code might treat Windows 9 as 95/98.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      29 days ago

      the official explanation is “marketing”. (there’s a few reasons for it. 9 is considered unlucky in japan, for example. they wanted branding with 10. etc)

      The fun thing is that there was a version that should have come out between 8 and 10 and didn’t. they decided to abandon it in very very pre-alpha because it was just that bad. (No, that probably doesn’t explain the gap. but its fun to poke at.). Basically it was supposed to take all the stupid features like seamless phone OS integration and tablet stuff and become some sort of uber universal-operating system that sucks.

    • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      29 days ago

      8.1 used build numbers 9xxx (7 used 7xxx, 8 used 8xxx, and 10 started out using 10xxx), so you could argue it was technically Windows 9.

      • NoFuckingWaynado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        8.1 was a lot more different under the hood than it appeared. It was much more than a tweak or a patch. I’ve always felt like it was more of a Windows 9 with a retro 8 theme.

    • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      They wanted to be able to call it Windows X for religious reasons but then decided it was too obvious a tell. ☯️🔺x🔻☤

      Elon on the other Hand is not that thoughtful.

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    29 days ago

    The thing I miss about it is that it could run Leisurely Suit Larry 4. It won’t even launch on any other OS.