Have I been out of the loop on politics?

Wasn’t it the Dems who voted to protect Union Pensions? Republicans voted against it.

Dems voted to extend the child tax credit this year. EVERY Republican voted against it.

And didn’t Kamala Harris run on helping with funding for first time home buyers?

When did the narrative of Dems being against the working class start? Was it just because Bernie said it recently?

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s not that they’re against the working class, it’s that they don’t do enough to fight for the working class. How can they when they all take money from billionaires and invest in their companies?

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    ive been waiting 30 years for them to end the ‘war on drugs’. or enact ‘universal health care’.

    notice they let the post office get brutalized with irrational fiscal policies and have done nothing to stop it. hell, biden still hasnt removed the guy that was put in place to fuck it all up.

    college costs an arm and a leg because the let student be victimized by student loans. they arent trying to stop that loan process. just clear out some old debts. half-assed at that.

    theyve done almost nothing to simplify the tax paying process despite every other modern taxing country having it be automatic.

    so many little bits they just dont give 2 shits about because money. because corporate interests.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    NAFTA and Wall Street bailouts come to mind.

    In regards to Bernie, his premise is that wealth inequality is the core problem, which means tax the rich until they can’t have an outsized influence on our politics.

  • Kintarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think there’s a misconception about elected officials. Many people believe they work to improve the lives of American citizens, but they don’t. Most of their time is spent fundraising and catering to wealthy donors. The majority of them don’t care about you at all.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago
    • Support for slavery before the Civil War

    • Carter’s airline deregulation

    • Clinton’s welfare “reform” and NAFTA

    • Obama’s finance sector bailout

    • Biden blocking a national rail strike

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Democrats used to be the conservative party before Nixon (my timing might be off) said “Hold my beer” and turned the Republicans into the regressive Christian theocracy it is today.

      So, the civil war thing doesn’t really count because it was a different party with different ideals under the same name.

      • Fermion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Isn’t that when student loans became bankruptcy proof and death or payoff became the only legal ways to be rid of them?

        Nvm those changes occured in different phases from 1976 through 2005.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That was Bush I think, maybe Clinton.

          But Obama followed similar anti peasant practices.

          My gripe is that his loosey policy was essentially charity for schools since now they were able to charge whatever they wanted and they did.

          Millenials bags are super heavy. Many are unlikely to pay it off and will face a tax bill once the loans are forgiven once they turn 50🤡

          So much life wasted for no reason but tonfund boomers lifestyle

  • derekabutton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yes, the Democratic party is against the working class. Yes, the Republican party is much, much, much worse. Yes, you have been out of the loop if you need examples.

  • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ignoring Bernie for the moment, “against the working class” is usually a dogwhistle for “poor whites have racial nervousness and i want to exacerbate that for political gain.”. You wont find real examples because, generally, professional democrats arent against anyone. (even nazis, apparently.)

    Bernie’s specific crtique was a slightly tone-deaf critique that the dems were largely silent on the economic nervousness of the working class, and instead spend political capital fighting for racial and gender equality. Since the white male working class is not oppressed by race or gender, or in a position to really oppress anyone, they often feel unrepresented.

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is extremely reductive identity politics. The point of the 2024 election results is that Trump made gains with all racial groups. You can’t just boil it all down to identity. Beyond that practical lesson, identity politics is bad for any country because it is a zero-sum game. If we don’t look past identity politics to a common set of ideals, we will end up with people at each other’s throats.

  • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Democrats in the past 10 ish years have been absolutely horrendous at marketing, allowing Republicans to take up all of the media talking space, traditional or otherwise. TV, news, podcasts, social media influencers, YouTube, etc. are all generally Republican leaning.

    Republicans control the talking points and co-opt anything that the Democrats say. Meanwhile, Democrats are either unable or unwilling to do the same.

    Republicans’ control of the media allows them to get away with way more things than the Democrats. It allows them to essentially claim that they’re for the working class while simultaneously working against working class interests, especially when heard by people who don’t generally follow political news. Meanwhile, Democrats get called out for relatively smaller issues, and that makes them seem elitist and uncaring of working class issues.

    One major facet of the Democrats being unable to control their marketing is their unwillingness to use populist rhetoric, even though by policy stances they should be (comparatively) more closely associated with populism than the Republicans. I’ve heard several takes on why Harris lost the election and the one that I most agree with is that she failed to use populist rhetoric and was unable to differentiate herself from Biden. People wanted change, and Harris offered the status quo.

    Remember that the vast majority of Americans don’t pay attention to politics, and so voter impressions are decided by tone and messaging rather than specific policies

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think it’s a lot easier to spread right wing narratives than left wing. The country itself is inherently right wing.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    We have a two party regime where Democrats plays the good cop…

    But make no mistake these regime whores are colluding to extract value from working class and pass to the owner class, while they get their cut.

    Millions for billions