• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        They still tie it to your ID since you need the phone number.

        And we just trust them not to share your social map to NSA which they totally don’t do. Trust me bro

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          The NSA already has your social map from Apple, Google, Facebook/whatsapp, plus a hundred other sources you’ve given access to your contacts in the past decade.

          Even if you’ve never used any of those, or given any app access to your contacts, 99% of your contacts have.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Data is about as good as it is current though and many people are reducing their exposure to these parasites

            A person can now pretty easily go without logging into any of these apps with a few adjustments.

            Hence why signal relationship maps will be even more valuable going forward. Hence my theory about signal…

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I’m not getting you.

              There’s correspondence, there’s metadata, and there’s phone-ID relationship.

              Signal still protects #1 and #2 better than #3. And the way it works, infrastructure load is much bigger than for most other messaging platforms. So it makes total sense they limit registration somehow .

              I’m not sure I remember by now what I’ve read about Signal protocol, but I think the fact of who messages whom they don’t have, so it’s not just trust.

              ~~Anyway, if you’ve read about 90s’ mixmaster servers for mail, while Signal developers don’t approve of alternative clients, there are libraries and it’s possible to make some kind of a mixmaster bot. ~~

              I’ve left this, because it’s funny as a good illustration of why they don’t want alternative clients, among other things - because I’ve described a voluntary MITM.

        • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          That they do, but your contacts doesn’t have to get it anymore.
          A self-hosted matrix stack built from source with matrix clients built from source with e2ee implemented that you yourself have the competence to verify the encryption and safety of would be the only secure communication I know of if you don’t want to trust a third party.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why would you use iOS if you care about privacy?

          Because it’s far better for privacy than any Google-Play-Services-ridden version of Android, and sometimes in life you don’t want to have to deal with custom ROMs anymore.

          But also that’s an exceptionally dumb question, because the implication is that privacy can’t matter to people who don’t go to the same precise lengths someone else does.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      After Signal’s lie about dropping SMS support because of “engineering costs”, I really can’t believe anything else they say.

      Plus the app experience sucks, it’s no better than SMS.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        it’s no better than SMS

        That’s not true, but even so, the whole point is to be an alternative to SMS. It provides that experience, so I’m happy.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Wasn’t another explanation people mistakenly sending SMS and getting fucked when they meant to send a Signal message?