• _carmin@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    You’re telling me this free, volunteer-run feature full software isn’t almost as good as the multi-million dollar product from a multi-billion dollar company?

    If this dude can edit his videos and images on Linux so can you Mr Van Gogh. https://youtu.be/lm51xZHZI6g

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Yes, that’s what we’re saying. It’s fine though, I don’t expect developers to work miracles for free, they are doing an amazing job, but In the context of “Linux being ready” it’s important to recognize some honest truths.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Thank you. All of this libre software is amazing, and impressive as hell, but that doesn’t exempt it from having usability issues and other valid points of criticism.

        Calling that out isn’t inherently anti-Linux or anti open source. I want all of these tools to improve to the point that there’s no fucking contest and they are the de facto standard (like blender is), but shit is going to have a harder time improving if people have blinders to valid criticism.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        But also, whenever someone pulls that card I just point at Blender until they go away.

        Hell, there is such a widespread appetite for a PS alternative you’d think it’d be easier for Gimp than Blender at this point.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Users do not care about how hard the devs are working for free. If the software doesn’t have the features, it’s not ready.

      Really think about this. You’re saying two entirely contradictory things:

      1. Linux software is ready to compete with Windows

      2. Users cannot expect Linux software to have comparable features to Windows

      How will it compete without comparable features? Passion and morals aren’t valued over effectiveness by most users.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        GIMP’s engine is very good. It’s UI is cuntpuke.

        Somebody write a QT front end for Imagemagick and you’ll probably see Linux adoption jump.