LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 6 months agoThe eternal debate over the M10 Booker (by @EODHappyCaptain)sh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up1107arrow-down13
arrow-up1104arrow-down1external-linkThe eternal debate over the M10 Booker (by @EODHappyCaptain)sh.itjust.worksLOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square10linkfedilink
minus-squareCarmakazi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·6 months agoIn technical terms it is a tank. We are refusing to call it a tank I assume because of some organizational/order of battle reason. Its not a tank, its an infantry fire support weapon or whatever the fuck.
minus-squareVerifiedSource@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·6 months agoIt’s a tank. It’s not a main battle tank.
minus-squareneidu3@sh.itjust.worksMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoTechnically, anything hollow can be used as a tank. Just not the type you use in combat.
minus-squareVerifiedSource@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoSome kind of armor is where it’s at.
In technical terms it is a tank.
We are refusing to call it a tank I assume because of some organizational/order of battle reason. Its not a tank, its an infantry fire support weapon or whatever the fuck.
It’s a tank. It’s not a main battle tank.
Technically, anything hollow can be used as a tank. Just not the type you use in combat.
Some kind of armor is where it’s at.