NOTE: the late “Lemmy” is a beloved Brit* musician from an enjoyable rock band, perhaps with some Led Zep-type analogues? (sorry, I just didn’t know him very well; kinda before my time)


Okay, what I’m trying to explain here is how we search for things and how we find them, particularly when we include the magical word: “Lemmy” in our searches.

For example-- I can just half-awake, lazily type something like “reddit” + search term, and BOOM! Robert’s your avuncular figure.**

Now, by comparison, hopping on an instance, so far I’ve found that searches within the Lemmysphere are remarkably strong. (well, at least for lemm.ee; I love my instance)

Unfortunately, that’s not how most people search and find us, which more typically involves Google, etc.

Hence my question, laddies & lassies-- i.e. is there anything we can do to influence how this search-stuff works…?


* see, I always find a way to relate things back to Europe, haha

** like “there you go,” ie. “Bob’s your uncle,” a classic Brit pub-phrase

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    For anyone who doesnt know Lemmy, just want to say hes easy to get a bad first impression of.

    He was really well respected by people in music and was a good soul.

    Theres an good documentary on him i think was on netflix.

    Also My favourite clip of him

    Also fun fact, he was a roadie for Jimmy Hendrix

  • craig9@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I just did some experimenting, and in duckduckgo.com at least, searches like this work quite well:

    “Best CPU (site:lemm.ee OR site:lemmy.world OR site:lemmy.ca)”

    Not exactly user friendly, but it’s a starting point. At least two ways forward:

    1. A browser plugin with a config page allowing you to select/deselect your favourite instances, and make a bang operator to suit: e.g. “!lemmy”

    2. Petition search engines to do this themselves.

  • mac@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Kagi (a paid search engine) has a “fediverse forums” filter option.

    • mycelium underground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      And the search actually returns relevant results, not a bunch of ads. If you have used free search your whole life, it kind of sucks to pay for it, but I would rather pay for searching than be a product people pay for every time I search. It doesn’t take much thought to see why being the product will always lead to a worse search platform.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Honestly, it shouldn’t cost that much for free search engines to build in — shouldn’t add a lot of compute load or anything. I expect that what Kagi did was to run a spider to build a list of hostnames and then to basically do a site search on a huge number of sites. If there’s demand, other search engines could provide similar functionality.

  • kreynen@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    @JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee isn’t part of the point of ActivityPub to avoid vendor lockin/single point of billionaire enshittification? I read and interact with a fair amount of Lemmy content through an Mbin instance.

    You can already limit Google using site:[DOMAIN].

    If every ActivityPub driven service used a common TLD like .edus, you’d be able to limit results to that facet of Google’s index, they don’t. If they did, we’d be back to a single point of failure.

    Google supports limiting searches to content using a Creative Commons license based on the licensing metadata in the URL. ActivityPub content already has the metadata, but it took a decade to generate enough content before Google offered the option to filter searches by CC-BY-SA… and Google was a VERY different company back then.

  • WanderingShadow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reddit is all on one domain, so a search on that is a fairly simple thing to do. Lemmy is a lot of different inter-connected sites, most of which don’t even contain “Lemmy” in their name, making it a much more difficult ask.

    • JWBananas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      And to make matters worse, because all of those domains have a good chunk of nearly identical content, they end up appearing like SEO content farm spam to the algorithm. It’s like all those sites that used to clone Stack Overflow back in the day.

      • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        A search engine could easily enough set up their own Lemmy server to search from. Same with Mastodon.

        Sure, but if Google actually did that, a lot of people here would go apeshit about them profiting from this content.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      the minus would remove sites. Useful it you want to do X -site:reddit.com but that leaves all that isn’t reddit.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      As someone else pointed out above, they have had a search lens to do this for some time. It’s called “Fediverse Forums”.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          No problem. I ignore most of the extra features they provide — my interest in them is really for the privacy aspect — and the ability to search the Threadiverse is one of the very few extra features that I actually make meaningful use of.