• thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like the problem with Discovery is the same of the warp 10 episode in Voyager. A bunch of people create the most OP way of travelling and barely use it, and don’t tell me that the ship is unique and Stamets is the only person in the universe in the following centuries to be able to use it, because that just doesn’t make any sense, it’s a cheap trick to justify why such an incredible technology has never been mentioned after, not even by a super villain that gives no crap about genetic augmentation.

    At least with Voyager you could just write it off as a badly written episode, but you cannot ingore a whole series. Yes even TNG had some magical guy make the ship travel fantaszilion light years, but at least it was out of their control and they could not exploit it.

    Also, Trek shows have not been the most consistent ever, but Discovery really went their way on completely distegarding every Star Trek lore existing in the first season which, personal theory, is a major reason for the writers to “get rid” of the ship at the end of season two. Discovery just did not make sense in the universe created by the othee series, to put it where it does no more damage.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It could have been solved if they just decided that the mycelium network got destroyed. They could have had Control release a weapon that destroyed it or something. I agree, “never talk about this” doesn’t make sense when science progresses and someone else could have easily discovered it. And I’m guessing there were plenty of spies from Romulus and other such places that became aware of at least the basics of the spore drive.

      I like Discovery a lot, but it was handled badly.

      • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Honestly, I liked it much more than I thought, given what I saw on YouTube before watching the entire season, especially the klingon battles. After season 1 it gets much better, which seems to be a recurring theme in Trek shows, but for a very different reason herr.

        Altought I really don’t like most character (especially Burhnam) and I find most of the representation of seasoned officers overly dramatic and silly (looking at you Tilly), most of the themes are well treated and some episodes were particularly good (I enjoyed the mirror episodes more than I could think possible given the first episodes).

        Sometimes it feels a very generic scifi show and it doesn’t get me too attached, but it’s a decent enough show to keep watching.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I never have high expectations for a sci-fi show’s first season, because most of them are still finding their footing, which is harder to do with sci-fi and its dramatic plots than it is with a sitcom. So while I agree, Discovery got a lot stronger after season 1, I let a lot of stuff in season 1 slide. I just wish they had found better resolutions to things in season 1 in later seasons.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        They couldn’t have destroyed the network, because it was strongly implied that it was a fundamental aspect of the universe itself. What would have been better is if some higher-dimensional beings living there said “You abused the privilege, and your rights to use this network have been revoked”.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t think you need to do a ‘god said so.’ That’s a real deus ex machina. I’m sure there are ways to make the network unusable for travel in crafting the show.

    • porthos@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      A bunch of people create the most OP way of travelling and barely use it, and don’t tell me that the ship is unique and Stamets is the only person in the universe in the following centuries to be able to use it, because that just doesn’t make any sense, it’s a cheap trick to justify why such an incredible technology has never been mentioned after, not even by a super villain that gives no crap about genetic augmentation.

      That wasn’t really the reason, the reason wasn’t nobody else could figure it out or that nobody wanted to do it because it required genetic modification, the reason was that jumping on the mycelial network was actively killing it unless I am misremembering things which is in line with the rest of star trek’s ethos (how about the DS9 episode where they help the dominion destroy a trans warp gate for example? There are other technologies that are abandoned and hidden for the greater safety of the universe all over Star Trek, it can be really silly I agree but I don’t think discovery is unique here.

        • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fuckin’ jeepers, this is grasping at straws.

          There’s no “lore” regarding the spore drive or the uniforms, so nothing to disregard.

          What specific lore about the Klingons was abandoned by Disco. Just one specific thing. Any single, specific thing.

          • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            In Discovery, instead of honorable warriors, the klingons are a bunch of sneaky backstabbing and coward warriors. They also don’t look like klingons at all, both in appearance and architecture, the speak like their mouth is full of potatoes and for some reasons they make ships out of coffins.

            I’m not against change, what I don’t like is calling another thing with its name just because you get to be part of a franchise. The only thing they have in common with klingons of other series is the language and that they want to kill. All the modifications they made, just for the sake of it, makes it look like they wanted to use the standard scifi appearal of standard bad aliens and just put the name “klingons” on it. No surprise they reverted this change and discarded all of this in season two.

            Btw “the klingons started growing their hair again” might be the single most stupid line I’ve ever heard in a Trek show, especially considering the reason why it was said.

            • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              In Discovery, instead of honorable warriors, the klingons are a bunch of sneaky backstabbing and coward warriors.

              Like they are in TOS?

              They also don’t look like klingons at all

              Are you similarly upset by the change in appearance the occurred between TOS and TMP?

              and architecture

              Architecture? I don’t know, the House Mo’Kai fortress we see in season two doesn’t seem all that out of place. The rounded towers of the capital city seen in ENT is a greater divergence than anything we see in Disco. But that’s also fine, because architectural styles change over time.

              the speak like their mouth is full of potatoes

              And apparently, according to experts in the language, that’s the best Klingon has ever sounded on screen. Not really sure how that qualifies as a lore thing, though.

              they make ships out of coffins.

              One ship. The home of a cult leader.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The retcon is that the whole spore drive program was actively suppressed, because any knowledge of Discovery and/or Control would lead to cosmic apocalypse. And so part of Section 31’s imprimatur was to work behind the scenes and prevent it and other disruptive tech from seeing the light. And other civilizations did the same, because the same thing happened to them at some point in their history.

      It’s pretty sweaty, and requires quite a bit of stretches credulity, but it beats a lazy handwave.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I assume the spore drive is in a wood box in section 31s “neato beans” warehouse next to Rikers “phase through matter and I guess go invisible whatever do what you want bro” cloak.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I feel like the issue with Discovery is that it just shoe-horns in an overproduced and under considered last 2 episodes every season in the name of “stakes”.

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 months ago

    The only issues I have (currently, until proven wrong) with DIscovery with the Spore Drive and other technological things, is that it didn’t seem to have an answer for why the Federation didn’t use it later. I do know that in the timeskip season, a log does not mention the use of the s-drive.

    But man I can only imagine how pissed Admiral Janeway would have been to find out it exists.

    Plus I can’t hate a show that has Doug Jones in it. I didn’t get into Discovery, but I don’t hate it.

    • Value Subtracted@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      it didn’t seem to have an answer for why the Federation didn’t use it later.

      Well, you need to either find and enslave an exotic space tardigrade in order to navigate the network, or illegally splice said tardigrade’s DNA into your own.

      And even then, navigation is pretty challenging, and can result in accidental time and/or interdimensional travel.

      And a malfunction has the potential to destroy all life in the multiverse.

      And both ships that had the prototypes installed were lost within about a year.

      Take your pick, really.

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 months ago

        For the reward of instantaneous travel, I’m sure the Federation could muddle its way through amending a 100 year old law. The rest of the points don’t seem all that different than the complications we see our heroes regularly encounter exploring the galaxy. And none of them were enough to convince the crew of the Discovery to stop using the spore drive for the rest of the series.

        Don’t get me wrong, I love Discovery anyway. Trek is full of miracle technologies that go conveniently forgotten. Janeway has no reason to be miffed given that she sat on an infinite speed drive herself, which had no downside that the doctor wouldn’t have been able to cure after it took them home.

      • VindictiveJudge@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 months ago

        And a malfunction has the potential to destroy all life in the multiverse.

        I didn’t like that part at all. An infinite multiverse, which they state in DSC is the case, means that anything with a probability greater than zero is guaranteed. Mathematically, the multiverse should have already been wiped out at some point. It’s also a throwaway line meant to increase dramatic tension for all of ten seconds before the scene ends, and an empty threat given that following through would end the show.

        • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Maybe it’s like vacuum decay; yes, it’s already happened, but maybe it doesn’t propagate instantly. There are expanding pockets of dead universes around where malfunctions occurred, but the Multiverse, in its infinite size, means that these pockets are also infinitesimally small compared to it.

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yyyyyyeahhh genetic modification has been a BIG NO-NO in trek canon since the 1990s eugenics wars, right…?

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          That didn’t stop Bashir’s parents. If regular parents can make it happen it for their below average child, a Dr Noonian Soong type will be all over it.

      • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fair enough. Tho I’m sure Janeway would still consider using Tuvix for that one editing your DNA thing.

        • Value Subtracted@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          Spock flat-out said it at the end of “Such Sweet Sorrow, Part 2”, albeit with a focus on the time travel shenanigans of the second season:

          Regulation 157, Section 3 requires Starfleet officers to abstain from participating in historical events. Any residual trace or knowledge of Discovery’s data, or the time suit, offers a foothold for those who might not see how critical, how deeply critical, that directive is.

          Therefore, to insure the Federation never finds itself facing the same danger, all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again, under penalty of treason.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      All it would take is a Short Trek where someone rediscovers the network and encounters a group of advanced beings living there, who explain that it has been closed to current warp-capable beings because they have proven themselves not ready for the privilege yet.

      Discovery was like Alexander the Great stumbling onto warp drive.

    • TwoCubed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can look past the mycelial network. I just can’t tolerate some of the characters. And unfortunately they decided to focus on one main character. And that character’s main feature is to cry throughout the entire series, despite being raised by vulcans. Also the pacing of the show is very annoying. It’s high tension drama, all the time.

      I watched the whole thing. There were some episodes that kinda gave me hope. Those usually were the ones that weren’t part of the main plot. But the next episode it went back to the same dramatic formula.

      Oh, and Tilly. What the hell man? How did she get into Starfleet??

      That said, I’m happy people enjoy it! It’s just not for me.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      For that matter, they didn’t even use it well at the time. Their accuracy of jumping with the spore drive was shown to be good enough that they could jump inside the shield bubble of every Klingon supply base, launch a bunch of torpedoes, and get out. War = done.

  • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Gotta admit that introducing big fancy transwarp highway in a prequel wasn’t the most clever move… Especially considering Voyager…

    • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Depends on the episode.

      When Quark is abducted from Deep Space 9 in “House of Quark” he’s taken clear across the entire Federation and into the Klingon Empire in about a day. And then D’Ghor sends someone to the station to grab Rom and get him back to Qo’noS the next day.

      Trek moves at the speed of plot.

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    Pssssh, I bet these people don’t even realize that reversing the quantum polarity in the nacelles is absolutely a hard science solution to whatever problem the enterprise faces.

    (Please don’t verbally hit me for that sentence.)

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t like Discovery because of the nonsense with the Klingons. I don’t know why they changed their look again, but mostly I like to be able to do other things when watching TV, like cleaning up or making food, and hate the subtitles.

    I understand if I’m watching a movie and a scene takes place in France with a bunch of Frenchmen speaking in French accents that “in universe” they are actually speaking French and it’s being translated to English for my benefit. The long drawn out subtitled scenes just killed the show for me. Give me a dubbed Discovery and I’ll happily give it a go.

      • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t pretend to be. It just strains my willing suspension of disbelief beyond the breaking point. I don’t even know why it’s the spore drive that does it instead of telepathy or fucking Q, but it is.

  • MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m not much of a fan of Discovery, as seems to be the case for many Trek fans. It’s alright though. But this aspect I found myself enjoying. I liked the whole mycelial network angle.

    • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, I like Disco because I think they’re at least trying to do something, and that’s interesting to me. They don’t always succeed, but I respect the attempt. However, I fully get why people don’t like it.

      My issue is with the silly complaints, not what amounts to a matter of taste.