• SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s literally a secular state lol.

      Islam is the second-largest religion in Israeli and Israeli Muslims have full rights and representation in government.

      Israel is the “official state of the Jewish people” but not only a state for the Jewish people. It’s just the one that reliably won’t exterminate them.

      • dwalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        If i said: South Africa is the official state of the white people. How would you feel about it?

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          White people is a race, so it’s a little different. Also S.A. has a history of apartheid, so that would be worrying for them specifically.

          • dwalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ok, so you agree that israel differenciates between religions.

            Positive descrimination is still discrimination, especially then you discriminate in favor of the majority.

            Example: USA is the state of the cristian people. Is this good? Is this secular?

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I don’t believe an argument can realistically be made that the US is particularly Christian at all, as a government.

              Some conservatives use Christianity as a tool to get elected though.

              A Christian nation, for instance, would take care of their poor and welcome immigrants.

              • dwalin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                It was an example. You are missing the point.

                The point is: if a state has in its base law a preference for one religion over another, it can never call itself secular. Even if they teach evolution in schools.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  It doesn’t, though. None of its laws are preferential or exclusive. What you linked above isn’t a law that restricts anyone.

                  And if you’re curious, should a right-wing government there impose those laws, id wholeheartedly support reforms.