• FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      130
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      People have a terrible understanding of orbital mechanics and apparent weightlessness. It’s not like gravity just stops affecting you after you get out of the atmosphere. Getting out of the atmosphere is the easy part of getting to orbit. Going sideways fast enough is the hard part.

        • Rakonat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          102
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I used to baby sit a friend’s kid when he was a wee lad, frankly we spent most time playing KSP. Used to give him challenges like if he could build a ship using x amount of parts and make orbit would let him order out pizza instead of food his mom prepared for us. He rarely succeeded at first but apparently kept at it long after I stopped mentoring him and apparently is now going to school to be an aerospace engineer. And before all that his mom could never get him to do his math homework as a tyke.

    • Rykzon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s easy, instead of accelerating towards your destination you just have to brake and stop moving to let the earth move under you, checkmate physics

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is dumb as shit. Hot air balloons only go so high, less than 70k feet according to records. They only stay aloft if the heat is continually applied, if not, air cools and they sink. They move with the air, and the air moves with the planet.

    This doesn’t work for the same reason jumping in an airplane doesn’t slam you into the back wall.

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 months ago

    Missed opportunity there: get more seats installed or attach the balloon to a bus or something, I don’t know - and whenever the earth below rotates to where your destination is, just yeet yourself out Felix Baumgartner style.

    More people means more profit and fewer busloon trips needed, meaning the eco footprint is smaller and you’ll get a Christmas card off a random polar bear/penguin thanking you your service.

    The only minor inconvenience I can think of is that your parachute effectively takes up your carry-on luggage allowance so you’ll have to pay to check anything that doesn’t fit in your pockets, but other than that I think you’re good to go

    • Ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      attach the balloon to a bus

      Yo boys we’re going on the battle bus (sorry for my terrible joke, it just reminded me that I’m fucking old because this was popular like 6 years ago)

    • wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      just yeet yourself out Felix Baumgartner style.

      this would be so awesome. i’d spend the whole time trying to come up with something clever to say, right before the yeeting.

    • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is my favourite proposition purely because it gives us busloon. Busloon is love, busloon is life.

  • MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not a rocket surgeon, but I think the amount of energy required to reach orbit is higher than what a jet would use.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nah, weather balloons can get really really high. The problem here is, the atmosphere doesn’t “end” it just gets thinner and thinner. You would still spin with the earth, just a bit slower.

      • Fuck spez@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The problem here has almost nothing to do with the atmosphere and nearly everything to do with the massive amount of energy required to cancel out the inertia of already moving at about 1000MPH radially relative to the center of the earth, assuming anon launches his magic balloon from the equator. The kind of energy that takes, oh IDK, a fucking rocket.

        In other words, if you could actually float above the atmosphere somehow, you wouldn’t just stop relative to the surface of the planet because it’s not the air current that carries you along, but the fact that you started off moving along with the earth’s rotation and did nothing to slow down.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem is the atmosphere more or less spins with the planet.

        Ignore winds for a second, and just imagine the hot air balloon going up. The balloon goes up because the density of the balloon is lower than the air it’s displacing. At some height that will no longer be true, and the density of the balloon will be the same as the atmosphere, at that point the balloon can’t go any higher. Because of that, the balloon will always be in a fairly dense part of the atmosphere.

        So, if it weren’t for the winds, the balloon would just rotate with the planet. But, the balloon will be caught in the wind. If it takes off from North America or Western Europe, it’s most likely going to end up in a westerly trade wind. If it’s going up from South America or Africa the main trade winds would be headed east. Some of these would be hurricane force winds at the surface, but they’re still much slower than a jet. So, a balloon could go around the globe, but it would take 3-4x as long as a jet to go the same distance.

        These trade winds are how the Chinese spy balloon was launched from China but was able to float over the USA. If a balloon can go up and down in the atmosphere, it can often be directed pretty well towards some specific spot because there’s often a wind at some height going the direction needed.

        Also, to address the “inventor’s” idea that a balloon in the stratosphere would “stay in one place”, even if you could completely leave the atmosphere you wouldn’t stay in one place. Anything going up from the surface would have a certain amount of angular momentum due to the rotation of the earth. At the surface this is 460 meters per second at the equator, or approx 1000 miles per hour. So, if you wanted to not rotate with the earth, you’d have to accelerate to 1000 miles per hour relative to the surface just to be stationary with respect to something outside the planet, like say the sun. You can do this in a jet. In fact, if you take a jet going west, sometimes you end up going more or less the same rotational speed of the planet, just the opposite direction. This can be fun when you take off at 9am, fly for hours, then land at 9am. It gives you pretty brutal jet lag though.

        Orbit doesn’t really come into it. They’re talking about a balloon in the stratosphere. But, if you wanted to go into orbit, to be in orbit you have to accelerate sideways. Whether you’re going east to west, west to east or north to south orbit has nothing to do with the rotation of the earth, only its mass. To reach low earth orbit you’d have to get to about 8 km / second, or about 20x as fast as the rotation of the earth. This is what most of the rocket fuel is used for when a rocket puts something into orbit.

        In fact, the scenario describes is one where you could never be in orbit. If you’re in a fixed place with the earth rotating under you, your orbital velocity is zero, and there’s no orbit where that’s possible.

    • MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And winds aloft are often going much much faster than on the ground.

      And temps, youd have to do a lot to keep warm.

      And pressurization, at ~60k ft your blood boils.

      • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s how you make your money! Sell them suits!

        The suits don’t have to work. The customer won’t complain either way.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Your blood won’t boil inside of your body, if it can’t be exposed to the outside via flesh valves it’s actually really good at keeping things in and relatively pressurized. If you got cut or something though… That doesn’t sound like a fun time.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That does not answer the question. The balloon is not going to orbit, high atmospheric balloons exist and do not require propulsion.

      The reason it won’t work is because the atmosphere is coupled to the ground and rotates with the ground.

      • TinklesMcPoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think you have some terms mixed up. Orbit would refer to a body moving around another body is some type of elliptical revolution. High atmosphere balloons do require propulsion to get to altitude. The atmosphere coupled with the ground makes no sense. (think of a constant spinning marble in a gold fish bowl, the surrounding water doesn’t stay perfectly in line with the marble)

        The cartoon above does answer the question to some degree though. Essentially in order for the balloon to be stationary while the earth rotates below you would need a propulsion system to maintain its height (fight gravity) as well as combat high winds (that would prevent it from staying “stationary” relative to the earth below). I would imagine the benefit of getting outside of the earth atmosphere completely (which is what I believe you meant by orbit) is there would be no wind to fight against. The problem then is that the balloon would’ve popped by then.

        I think that’s right but someone could correct me.

        EDIT: Realizing we’re talking about high altitude balloons which wouldn’t need a propulsion system to achieve altitude, but would not be able to maintain altitude before popping. I think the rest of my statement stands true.

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Balloons go to 12 miles all the time, they stay at whatever altitude they are neutrally buoyant at. The OP says hot air balloons, but if you ignore that requirement you can get a non propulsed balloon to 30 miles up. It doesn’t just pop, it does leak slowly bc no bag is perfect.

          https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/j/topics/topics/2013/0920.shtml

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Going from the US to Japan or China by hot air balloon would mean going the long way over Europe due to the jet stream, this would take more than 12h.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think he’d run out of oxygen that high up wouldn’t he? Or it would get too cold for the balloon to stay inflated if he didn’t freeze to death first? Also, is a hot air balloon even capable of lifting a 500lb man-child that high? Would there even be room for his mobility scooter, his snacks and his high performance gaming PC?

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The density of the air becomes so thin that I don’t think you could have a container for enough hot air that wouldn’t weigh more than the lift provided. Helium weather balloons end up getting so large because of the pressure difference that they end up bursting at those altitudes.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The lift of the balloon depends on on the temperature difference and the air inside the envelope, and the air outside, and that part would actually work.

      As far as oxygen goes, you’d need to have a pressurised capsule suspended under the balloon, which has been done before.