South Korea is beginning the mass production of a low-cost laser weapon that has successfully shot down small drones during testing, the country’s key arms agency said Thursday.

The laser weapon, called Block-I, “can precisely strike small unmanned aerial vehicles and multicopters at close range,” a news release from South Korea’s Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) said.

The release did not give a cost for the weapon, but said each shot fired would only cost about $1.50.

Imagery supplied by the agency appears to show a weapon around the size of a shipping container with a laser mounted on top and what appears to be a radar or tracking device mounted on one side of the platform.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    What’s the kW or MW class of laser? If it’s too low, it could be ineffective against even tinfoil wrapped quad copters.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Might still be powerful enough to blind the optics, which would effectively cripple them. Without a video feed neither FPV drones nor grenade-dropping ones would have the necessary precision to be effective.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Unless they’re gps guided, or they can turn their camera away from the laser source in time.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Unless they’re gps guided

          These lower power DEW systems don’t target the optics they target propulsion, like the actual rotors themselves. Takes about 1-2 seconds to knock them out on the ISR type drones, maybe a bit longer on the FPV type depending on size.

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’d have thought the rotors would be harder to melt though because of their speed and cooling, but I guess it would work. Could you electroplate the rotors?

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Could you electroplate the rotors?

              I’m sure you could but the more armor you stack on the more you reduce the performance.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          GPS wouldn’t be effective at all for drones dropping munitions on infantry moving around on the battlefield, nor on FPV drones trying to fly into moving tanks or other vehicles.

          And how do you turn a drone away from an infrared beam of light that would damage the drones optics almost instantly? You’d have to spot the laser system from hundreds of yards away, recognize it’s aimed at your drone, and turn away before the laser is fired. And then what? Just avoid turning your drone back the way you want to go, hoping another strategically positioned laser you didn’t see doesnt fire from a different direction?

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            You’d need to know where the laser system is, yes. You could do that by having a first done get shot at to reveal the position so the others know where not to look.

            Gps would still be effective against stationary targets, but gps jamming would probably be very effective.

    • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      A buck fifty a shot at the rate I pay is about 12 Kwh kwH 😉 of power. That laser has got to be way up there in power.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Depends on the wavelength. Standard mirrors don’t always do mirror things at wavelengths far outside the visible spectrum.

        Part of the advantages of UAVs is that you can deploy a lot of them cheaply with stuff you buy on eBay. While eBay does sell some of the more exotic mirrors for CO2 laser cutters (which are far-IR wavelengths), you couldn’t buy a lot of them to cover a single drone. It’d cut into the cost advantage, and would also weigh it down a lot.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          My initial reaction was that it’s going to make drones more cost prohibited. Logistics of only deploying unshielded drones where there aren’t lasers will probably be a thing now too.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Even if they can, it will decrease the payload somewhat, and as the lasers get better the shielding will have to get stronger.

        It’ll forever be a back and forth thing