• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The solution to global warming is “deploy solar, wind, hydro, and storage en masse, and improve city infrastructure so that more people can walk, bike, and take public transportation rather than using their car”. All AI will do is tell us that, but that’s not the answer people want to hear.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Also reduce our imagined entitlement to most consumer goods. Not all CO2 emissions is from transport. Also, stop throwing food out. Half of all produce that leaves the farm is thrown out. Stop overfilling your plates and cope with some spots on your fruit. Agricultural CO2 emissions can be halved within a growing season.

      oh, and get rid of the elites that all profit from wasteful over consumption. These aren’t either/or solutions.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not all CO2 emissions is from transport.

        Heating homes is a big one.

        Making plastics, rubber.

        And energy production in general.

        Meat.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Meat

          100% agree.

          Lemmy and Reddit are on the same page regarding this. Everyone talks about big game about everyone else reducing their impact but as soon as you mention meat, they turn on you because that’s something they could eliminate themselves but won’t.

    • VerbFlow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, that wouldn’t just solve the climate crisis, that would also get people to talk to each other, help people exercise, cut down on pollution…

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      In general seems a weird idea to me to think that any “AI” will solve what humans can’t. Their most ambitious goal is something like an artificial human, on the dumb side at that.

      We can have a real human in ~20 years with the fraction of energy their “AI” requires. We already have plenty and they don’t deliver that magic they promise.

      I think it’s just completely clueless people being hellbent on getting from computer science the only thing they think they understand to be valuable in it.

      Either that or they want to have an oracle king, plausibly magical and wise in appearances, so that his solutions would have authority, while being, of course, fed to it by the controlling powers. A Mechanical Turk, only bigger.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      IA will answer whatever the corporation wants it to.

      Don’t look at the Indian guy at the terminal, focus on my voice and look at the display.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Guy even gave the plot away when he claims the AI will be incomprehensible, like meeting aliens. So they aren’t even pretending it will justify it’s answers.