In this study, the scientists simulated the process of spaced learning by examining two types of non-brain human cells — one from nerve tissue and one from kidney tissue — in a laboratory setting.

These cells were exposed to varying patterns of chemical signals, akin to the exposure of brain cells to neurotransmitter patterns when we learn new information.

The intriguing part? These non-brain cells also switched on a “memory gene” – the same gene that brain cells activate when they detect information patterns and reorganize their connections to form memories.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Its not the same memory as your brain. your life story is not in your non nerve cells. they have memory the same as yeast has memory but everyone is aware of how we have muscle memory in reptitive tasks.

    • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think muscle memory is just a phrase, but the training that makes and embed the “muscle memory” is essentially nural

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        yeah sorry I still feel that is neural just not all the way to the brain. I guess what I was trying to say if the article is not that cells hold your memory but that they hold their type of memories is a similar way.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not to be a debbie downer here, but it’s important to keep in mind that unless expressly stated otherwise, so-called discoveries that are only published in out-of-the-way (ie. not respected scientific journals) have usually not been peer reviewed or had their results replicated, which is the entire point of the scientific method.

  • ValenThyme@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    fascinating, this concept is a core to the theravadan buddhist practice of vipassana meditation, which is supposed to be what the buddha himself actually taught in his wandering classroom. I always took that bit with a grain of salt assuming it was just an old misunderstanding of what’s going on but the kind of non-thought memories appears to be exactly what is described.

    it’s called Vasana and it’s said to be like ‘perfume lingering in cloth’, the residual karma from our actions that shapes our future and influences automatic actions and preferences. Trauma is said to be stored in the body as well as Sankhara.

    I have always viewed vipassana as mental martial arts more than religion, and brushed off all the reincarnation and other inexplicable stuff. fascinating to hear scientists confirming what philosophers came up with thousands of years ago.

  • _bac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Its interestng, but kidney cells are not exposed to patterns of neurotransmiters like nerve cells are. Cells can be reprogramed to be stem cells as well with the right pattern od signals but that does not mean that it really happens in the body.

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, insofar as many reflexive actions, enervation and fiber recruitment thresholds respond to training, such that they “remember“ actions you have performed many times before. There are many clusters of nerves throughout the body called ganglia that are responsible for low-latency control of various functions that would entail too much delay when controlled entirely by the brain.

      Generally, the minimum input-process-activation turnaround time of the brain is about 4 hz (240-250 ms) which is too slow for many motor functions. But the “co-processing” allowed by the extended nervous system enables the body to, with practice, execute far more rapid and complex action sequences in response to local stimuli. Some actions can even be triggered and completed before a signal makes it to the brain.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Generally, the minimum input-process-activation turnaround time of the brain is about 4 hz (240-250 ms) which is too slow for many motor functions. But the “co-processing” allowed by the extended nervous system enables the body to, with practice, execute far more rapid and complex action sequences in response to local stimuli. Some actions can even be triggered and completed before a signal makes it to the brain.

        Thank you. For some reason it makes me happy to know that.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Read something like that in an old science fiction novel.

    Old man’s brain is placed in a young woman’s body. Her brain was destroyed but most of her memories live on in her body.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’d read that novel.

      Old man hell bent on world domination, but really wants Johnny in math class to ask him to the dance on Friday.

    • VubDapple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Robert Heinlein, I Will Fear No Evil

      “Elderly billionaire Johann Sebastian Bach Smith is being kept alive through medical support and decides to have his brain transplanted into a new body. He advertises an offer of a million dollars for the donation of a body from a brain-dead patient. Smith omits to place any restriction on the sex of the donor, so when his beautiful young female secretary, Eunice Branca, is killed, her body is used—without his knowledge and to the distress of some of those around him.”

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can tell it’s a really old book because they talk about $1 million like it’s a lot of money.

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      One of Iain M. Banks’ Culture novels has an exceptionally old character who is so exceptionally old that he’s had to turn most of his body into memory storage (sounds weird if you think in terms of computers) to keep remembering things. He stores his sexy memories in his balls.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          He’s in Hydrogen Sonata. The mcguffin guy who everyone is trying to find and talk to because he’s the only person who’s old enough to remember some very important thing about the early days of the Culture.

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Reminds me of the guy that got a heart transplant and took up smoking like the original owner of the heart and started dating the original owners ex.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It seem like they’re just saying kidneys remember kidney stuff, pancreases just remember pancreas stuff, etc etc.

    It’s not like your kidney remembers Aunt Jean has a mole on her nose.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is another body of research that deals with a person’s behavior can be heavily influence by endocrine actions. Organs can affect current endocrine responses. So there is a suggestion here that your kidney may not remember the Aunt Jean has a mole, it may remember why it releases certain hormones which can effect how you behave.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I dunno. We (both my wife and I) can and have had long conversations with my gut (when there’s a rumbly in my tumbly you can hear it across a crowded room) and my gut seems to remember shit. It also has a strange fascination with cheese.