• catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      105
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if I’d call materials science technology, exactly, but it’s certainly more on topic than “business but at a tech company” posts.

      • nul9o9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        My favorite part was when he held the jacket up like a curtain. The material may be bullet proof, but the bullet will still push it out of the way like that lol.

        • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same with the Fast&Furious it used to be about import vs muscle and real street racing. Then it became jumping hyper cars from falling buildings to the next building over and turned to shit. Like most over milked series.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Waiiiit, was it actually meant to be about import vs muscle, like that was it’s intention? Or did they just happen to do that.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know if this will actually pan out the way that they imply in the title; armor needs to have a lot of different characteristics in order to be practical. As in, resistance to heat and cold, resistance to acids, alkalines, petroleum distillates, salts, UV, and oxygen, and also resist deformation. Multiple materials have displays significant promise for armor, but had a very short lifespan in real-word conditions. For instance, there was a material trademarked as Zylon that was supposed to be better than Kevlar, and it was used extensively by Second Chance (a body armor company); several cops were killed when their armor failed, and the armor failed because of exposure to sweat and ambient heat.

    Yeah, this is a super cool development, but remember that everything that comes out at this stage is hype.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really depends on whether it can be made to meet all the other criteria required for armor. I think that it’s too early to make any good predictions.

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes… that’s why they use the word “could”. This is how research works and what reasonable science reporting looks like. There were no promises or wild claims made in the article.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good news, it’s completely non toxic.

      Bad news, it costs 2 million dollars per square foot.

      The pentagon will now take your whole paycheck.

      Thank you for your support, patriot.

      • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good news, it costs 2 million dollars per square foot, so they won’t militarise the police further with it.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well not immediately… Years from now when the military develops something even better then this will all become surplus and sold off to SWAT teams etc. for next to nothing.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is an old Russian joke.
          Son asks his father, “Daddy, I’ve heard the price of vodka went up, does it mean you will be drinking less?”, and the father answers “No, son, you will be eating less”.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      With these bonds so dense, I want to imagine that it would actually be quite non-toxic as these is little to react with.

      Then again, I’m not a bio chemist

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, and wouldn’t the rings be pretty fragile considering how long they are? So it would probably have similar bioactivity as like olive oil.

  • Baggie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure this is real, but I see a headline like that and I think of schoolyard talk. Like, nuh uh, my armour has 100 trillion bonds, you can’t shoot me.

  • inconel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I skimmed the article, scrolled down but people hasn’t mentioned its mechanically Chain mail in atomic scale yet? Did I read it wrong?