• Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I blocked them on my instance last year. Fuck threads and any instance that goes along with them.

        • GONADS125@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s precisely why I left L.W. They also were removing community posts voicing opposition to threads federation. I witnessed it firsthand, where posts I commented in (and in which the majority of comments opposed it) were removed.

          Now they removed the piracy communities again after promising not to. They are straight up untrustworthy and don’t care about what their users actually want.

          I am happy on feddit.de. They are defederated from Threads and the tankie instances.

            • GONADS125@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I hadn’t noticed until the posts were weeks old, so I didn’t want to dig thru the mod log…

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        If not Threads, what would you suggest to bring the billions of people who are stuck in legacy social media into the Fediverse?

        Why do we need to bring billions of people here again?

          • fcuks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            If you are after larger numbers of people, why are you here and not on legacy social media where the numbers mean those platforms are better in your opinion?

              • fcuks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Not sure what you mean by ethical superiority? There’s some pretty horrible and unethical instances on the fediverse… And I disagree with you that mass numbers of people means success

                  • prole@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I think some of us here might just have a different definition of “success” when it comes to content on the internet. Personally, I don’t agree that,

                    mass numbers of people means success

          • pezhore@lemmy.ml
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Not the OP, but Eternal September references the massive culture impact on Usenet when ISPs started lowering the barrier to joining the then somewhat exclusive forum-esque part of the internet.

            • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Gatekeeping the fediverse while also wanting it to stay alive and to not be “EEE” my meta won’t work unfortunately.

              • pezhore@lemmy.ml
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                I agree, but it’s a hard pill to swallow that Meta is the best partner to grow the fediverse. There are real lessons to learn from Embrace, Extend, Extinguish (look at XMPP and Google), not to mention privacy concerns and content moderation issues that seem to be a “feature” for Meta products vs bugs.

                I’m not sure what Zuck is up to, but for whatever it’s worth I think the best think the fediverse can do is be somewhat reactive to Meta’s movements.

                If instances start getting overwhelmed with content, then block.

                If Meta starts showing signs of EEE, then instances can block.

                And us users can move to instances that we feel match our personal stances on things - hate Facebook like the plague? Look at one of the defederated/blocking instances. Do you miss interacting with a larger audience? Stay on instances that are embracing (or withholding judgment) the Meta federation.

                It’s a complex topic to be sure, and the only way we’ll know the right way to deal with it is with the benefit of hindsight in a few years

                • shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  If Meta starts showing signs of EEE, then instances can block.

                  Well it looks like they’re at the first E, there, buddy. Look at what they’ve already done to the internet, to your country, to the world. You want to give them the benefit of the doubt?

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I don’t need or want those assholes here. Why do i want small business here? Why do i want facebook idiot grammas here? What would the point be? Fuck threads

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Seconded. There’s no need to have them here. The toxicity of FB, “fake news”, and the trolling that goes with it can stay the hell away from the fediverse. There’s enough to deal with here with issues from places like hexbear, CSAM, and whatever else, we don’t need knuckledraggers posting “only ‘60s kids will get this” BS along with “each upvote is a prayer for trump” or some shit.

          • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            You did, honestly. Having to read useless copycat comments (like the reply you just farted out) on Reddit everyday is why i left them. Not all of them are drooling wankers without a shred of imagination, but the loudest ones definitely were.

            To think for a second that they should remake this place in their image angers me.

            Ignorance and arrogance anger me.

            You anger me.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They can join a proper instance instead of a gigantic corporate-controlled one.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            In what way is slow growth incompatible with anything that requires network effects?

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Makes some sense, but market ownership doesn’t only go up, it goes down too. Services absolutely have downturns as well, and that’s what we’re really relying on. Like, reddits troubles the past year, for instance.

                Also, note, we still have user-facing issues to resolve. This platform in its current form has a limited appeal to non-techy people. That won’t change until the front-end gets more development and features. As it stands, average non-techy user pokes around a little bit and goes “ehhhh”, and it’s not necessarily due to a lack of content. That’s just a singular factor.

                  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Your assessment of Lemmy content seems to indicate you follow news and Fediverse communities.

                    Truly diverse content will come with the users, the users make the content, not the content making the users. You need something with the polish, simplicity and ease-of-use the average public expects though.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why should I care about any of that? Let them come one by one if they’re so inclined.

      • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        If not Threads, how do we turn this FOSS venture free of corporate interference into a new avenue for a mega corporation to harvest all of our data for profit?

        If not Threads, how will we ever ruin this place by turning it into Reddit?

        If not Threads, who will I shill for?