I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil. How can they win back the country? Is it too late?

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    18 days ago

    Democracy is just the tyranny of the majority.

    I think that most of the Americans want this, even if people on the outside do not understand. So in that sense they are right now winning back their country, as confusing as it might sound.

    • Deadlytosty@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Normally in Democracy the majority or popular vote wins, however due to the electoral college America has, it doesnt necessarily mean the majority voted for the winner. This was the case for Bush, and some other moments in the past.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Whether it’s 48 or 52 % is an immaterial difference. Every other American who voted, voted for Trump. The rest don’t seem to care either way. He has very broad popular assent and is as popular as Harris give or take a margin of error.

        Everyone is lasered-focused on the EC because it makes all the difference for the practicalities, but if one is to make a broad judgement of whether Trump won fair and square the answer is “yeah, mostly”. Further proof is the fact that the House is probably going to be his as well.

        Americans now bear the collective responsibility for the horrors of the next 4(+?) years. Do not make the mistake of blaming the popular will of outright fascism on institutional failures, because institutions didn’t force half of Americans to vote for the fascist, again.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 days ago

          I’ll wait 72 hours before settling with it, in case any shenanigans were involved. I expect it’s legitimate, but I want that window open if it’s needed.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        18 days ago

        Trump is winning the popular vote by a pretty decent margin. The electoral college isn’t the issue here.

        • gerbler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          They haven’t finished counting that’s why. Rural areas are faster to count and skew conservative.

          A republican hasn’t won the popular vote in 20 years. Trump is projected to win but like last time he’ll lose the popular vote and win by virtue of the electoral college.

          • Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            17 days ago

            All the projections I’m seeing him show him almost certainly winning the popular vote. There’s a gap of 6 million votes and almost every state is over 90% reported in. That gap is going to likely shrink a bit, but unfortunately it almost certainly won’t be enough for him to even lose the popular vote.

            Lets face it, we’re (assuming you’re american) apparently just a country of facists. It looks like GOP is going to have majority in both houses too so here comes project 2025 I guess.

            • gerbler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Sorry bud, not a yank. You have my sympathies though.

              If it turns out that he does indeed win the popular vote then yeah I’m sorry for your loss. A nest of at least 50% fascists or fascist enablers.

              Heart aches for those that did their civic duty and yet have to suffer the repercussions :(

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            It looks like turnout is way down compared to last election. Trump is pulling about the same amount he did last time ( maybe a few million down, but there are still results to get). Harris is currently down 15M from where Biden was.

            Trump’s support is no larger than it was last time. Harris’ supporters just didn’t show up

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              17 days ago

              Harris’ supporters just didn’t show up

              Anyone who didn’t show up is not a Harris supporter.

          • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Wasn’t he ahead in 2016 around this time, but then once all was said and done he was a few mil behind?

      • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        I believe the states responsible for those silly outcomes have since passed laws to prevent it happening again.

        Could be wrong, but I listened to a podcast last week with an American professor who’s pretty much written the book, explaining the history of the Electoral College and how it really works. I’m sure he said those states since fixed those loopholes.

        Either way, the damage is done today. Another four years of stupidity in charge.

        • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          This is not correct. The electoral college is exactly as susceptible to giving the win to the person with fewer votes as it was in 2000 and 2016. It’s also not an issue that’s due to any state in particular and is not an issue that can be solved by individual state action. The NPVIC would fix it but requires the cooperation of many states and is not in effect, and has stalled pretty hard in recent years.

              • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 days ago

                Seriously - the whole thing is such a befuddling mess to us non-Americans.

                How exactly can one win the popular vote but not the actual election? From the outside, the reporting I’ve seen always talks about the faithless elector problem (not in those words - just in describing the problems). Is it more to do with how many votes (electors) each state gets, based on population size?

                • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  That’s it, yes - each state gets as many electoral votes as it has congressmen, including senators. Most states award all of their electoral votes to whoever wins the state, with no proportionality to it at all - only two states (Nebraska and Maine, neither one large) do anything proportional with their votes.

                  With a system like that it’s easier to see how things can end up with the less popular candidate winning - they can, for example, sneak by with 50.1% of the vote in just enough states to win, but bomb it out with 20% of the vote in all the other states. That’s an extreme example specifically for the purpose of illustration, but less extreme versions of that are usually what happens.

                  The electoral votes also aren’t distributed entirely fairly - the number of electoral votes per person tends to be larger for less populated states. The less populated states also tend to be Republican states. So in a very real sense, each person’s vote counts for “more” in those states, and “less” in states with high populations. I don’t believe it’s really possible to fix this problem without vastly increasing the number of electoral votes, but congress currently has its size capped at 535 members for what I consider not very good reasons.

                  Yes, the whole system is trash from the ground up. But much of its structure is defined in the constitution itself, which is very difficult to change.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        18 days ago

        u̇nfoṙtcėnetlı, H ſımz t bı ƿinıŋ ð pȯpyulṙ vot æz ƿel.

        spoiler

        Unfortunately, he seems to be winning the popular vote as well.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      18 days ago

      No, there is a concerted effort by conservatives to use voter suppression to subvert the will of the majority in the US.

      conservatives are clawing back the country right now by hook and by crook.

      can’t go on forever, but I don’t know which is going to last longer: the country or the aging frightened conservatives willing to subvert democracy to hang on to control.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Isn’t just the aging ones sadly. Lots of young people, especially young men, went for Trump. Andrew Tate has taught them well.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          progressive policies are annually more popular and conservative policies and election results like 2016 and 2024 are won mainly by the old guard funding and utilizing their careful network of voting interference and collusion.

          Andrew Tate is a vile exception amongst younger generations, not the rule.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I think that most of the Americans want this

      Maybe, but none of the facts directly support this.

      There have been large campaigns to disenfranchise several types of voters for decades in the country. The Electoral College was designed to be unfair to appease Slave states. Voter turnout is abysmal, only about 35% of eligible citizens vote. Out of those turnout is usually around the same percentage. The highest turnout recently was 2020 only because mail in voting was expanded so dramatically, and even then it was only 67% of registered voters, so it was still only 67% of that original 37% of eligible voters. So with the highest recent turnout, we’re looking at about 25% of eligible citizens actually voting.

      • Max@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        I believe that the 67% number for the 2020 election is of eligible voters and not registered voters. While turnout is low, it’s not 25% low.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 days ago

          It was ~67% of eligible voters that were registered to vote. Over 94% of registered voters actually voted.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        Dafuk are you talking about? Voter turnout is 67% of all eligible voters. It’s highest since it’s ever been. And Trump won the popular vote. At least look at the facts instead of crying “stolen election”.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      vote against this and save us all from this idiocy.

      Nope. There was just more people lined up to vote for more idiocy. We failed the world. I’d say I’m sorry, but I don’t think that’ll help. This is America.

      America needs to focus on decentralizing power. That way, when the other side wins, they can’t do much damage. Biggest problem America faces is too much centralized control.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Democracy really is the worst form of government, just not as bad as all the others…

      Unfortunately in such polarized times like now, even though majority wants this, the ammount of people for which this is unacceptable is only slightly less than “the majority”. And besides, I believe a big part of “the majority” is just gullible enough to be persuaded they want this while it actually goes against their interests

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        And if the other candidate won, the other half would’ve been in the same state of “this is unacceptable”. Solutions?

        Cuz lemmy seems to think if their party wins it’s all good and if the other wins it’s the end of the world. While in reality it seems there’s a 50-50 split with each side equally hating the other.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          It is the limitation of democracy and why it is the worst (except all the others) - because it allows this.

          How to fix this? These would be a good start: don’t polarize the society like this and create us vs. them mentality. In place of power hungry populists have people in charge who want the best for the country. Don’t enable fascists - they never should make it this far. Respect other people. Invest in education so people understand these basics.

          And this is not just about US. It’s scary that this is wherr us got because they are such a big player on the world stage

          • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            The whole lemmy has been essentially about “us vs them” for the last few months. With zero discourse tolerated, only one opinion being allowed: trump bad, republicans fascist.

            So, if you worry about polarization, you guys are the biggest echo chamber I’ve seen to date.

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          It’s a famous quote. The contradiction is intentional. It means democracy has a lot of problems and often looks terrible. However when you step back and consider the alternatives they are worse.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Take it up with Winston Churchil - I was just paraphrasing his quote.

          The point is democracy is terrible, but we don’t have anything better.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 days ago

    As an American, I expected most Americans to be at least semi-rational and to recognize what a threat to democracy and our way of life that Trump is. I expected most Republicans to just vote for him out of reflex, but otherwise the rest of America would rise up in our hour of need to vote against this and save us all from this idiocy.

    Nope. There was just more people lined up to vote for more idiocy. We failed the world. I’d say I’m sorry, but I don’t think that’ll help. This is America.

    • Illogicalbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      17 days ago

      Agree, and sadly he won the popular vote too (so far). It’s really bleak how many people don’t vote at all.

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 days ago

      They all voted with their wallets. It’s really simple. That’s how these people are able to come into power.

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      The frustrating thing is that Trump didn’t even get more votes this election than he did last election. There wasn’t a bunch of new Trump voters that came out of the woodwork and turned the tide. He was absolutely beatable. He only won because 15 million of the people who voted for Biden last election just didn’t bother this time.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        A lot of progressive people also moved out of red states after all of the different nonsense happening in them. We won’t know until the 2030 census if they actually do that accurately unlike the 2020 census.

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        Democratic voters just aren’t dependable, or the causes that Democrats tend to champion don’t provide them any benefits. Yes, it’s often the right thing to do to champion their rights or causes, but when the time comes and their help is needed, they’re seemingly nowhere to be found because things apparently weren’t interesting enough.

      • alleycat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Pretty dystopic that you post this quote, because it is doctored to include catholics. Niemöller’s wife explicitly stated that he never included them in his poem. Source: https://martin-niemoeller-stiftung.de/martin-niemoeller/was-sagte-niemoeller-wirklich

        Martin Niemöllers zweite Frau (seit 1971), Sibylle von Sell  schreibt dazu am 23.4.2000 in h-holocaust https://www.h-net.org/~holoweb/ :.“ The trouble with Martin Niemoeller’s „famous quotation“ is that he never wrote it down – which enabled  so many hitchhikers  over the years to „put themselves on the waggon“. In his  „Confession of Guilt“  (as he called it himself: Schuldbekenntnis in German) the Communists came first, then the Trade Unionists and then the Socialists and then the Jews. NO ONE ELSE.”

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        17 days ago

        Just be grateful if you’re not in one of the first groups. I spoke up as loudly as I could.

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      The problem is that nowhere is safe now. I’m Canadian, and I wish I had somewhere to go. And just imagine how the poor sods in Palestine, Ukraine, and so many other suffering countries, are feeling right now.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Vladimir Putin’s armies weren’t occupying large swaths of Eastern Europe by the end of this term.

  • Myro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    I think this is going to be the end of the USA as we know it. After this period, democracy will be significantly impacted.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      17 days ago

      The western world as a whole should be terrified. There has been a sharp dip towards conservatism that will only accelerate with Trump back at the helm in the US. Brexit didn’t occur in a vacuum.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        17 days ago

        Though this isn’t about conservatism, is it? Trump doesn’t like democracy and half of the things that shaped the USA. I mean there is some overlap but he should be opposed by any sane conservative. I think it’s more a dip towards fascism or something else.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          17 days ago

          Can be a bit of both. Everything is prompted by a desire to return to the “before” times. For Trump’s supporters, that is a hypothetical, undefined time when America was “great”. For the Brexiters in the UK, that was the pre-EU period when Britain was a global empire. For the conservatives in Russia, it is the yearning for the USSR days.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            17 days ago

            Fair enough. I always hope we’ll move towards a better future… And not backwards. But you’re right. You pick some random time in history and then make up some policies that supposedly get you back to that place. And an additional psychological factor is, most of us had our best time when we were young, life was easier, less work and less consequence. So we might want that back instead of our current, more complex life.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    By finally doing what it clearly needs to do, splitting in multiple countries so red States can finally become third world countries like they so want to be.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s funny that the last time this was floated by Republicans, they thought they were kicking the Democrat states out.

      In other words, they thought they were keeping the Federal government.

      Republican states need Democrat states far more than vice versa.

      If Trump truly does win, Republicans won’t split the country. They’ll make it even more impossible to leave.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I mean, no matter who gets kicked out by who, there would be at least two federal governments… I think most people don’t realize that when a country splits, the (at least two) new entities both become independent countries with their own government…

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      So where do you think the lines would get drawn? West Coast and New England + New York are the obvious ones to do their own thing. Pennsylvania cuts off the DMV area from New York/New England, unless we go on a county level and excise just the area around Philly to keep the whole northeast Atlantic together.

      Is Chicago just left as an island in the Midwest? The red staters certainly won’t want it, and without it Illinois basically is a red state. RIP to the other midwest and southern cities too.

      Colorado and New Mexico together would be quite fucked being landlocked in a sea of red otherwise.

      Congratulations to Hawaii on its regained independence I guess. Alaska would probably be offered up to Putin as a thank you gift from Trump.

      Do you think all the red states stay together as a single entity? Texas is an obvious candidate to decide to fuck off on its own, possibly Florida as well. But would South Carolina really care all that much to stay tied to Montana, for example, or vice versa?

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    What do you mean? Trump won decisively. Electoral, popular, in the senate, etc…

    You’re really asking, “how does a minority continue to exist in the face of a fascist majority?”

    The answer is, generally, they don’t.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      I think that is an oversimplification. He won the popular vote, but that’s the majority of voters, not the majority of people, right? So we cannot accurately say that the majority is fascist. We can only say that the voting majority is fascist.

      And then we need to look at who was conned, and how. Of course people who got conned need to work harder to avoid that in the future. We all agree on that. At the same time, the con artists and the people who enable the con, we also need to identify them and figure out what’s making them successful. If we talk about major newspapers and TV networks failing to cover how bad Trump actually was, or putting Harris on unrealistic pedestal, newspaper owners refusing to allow newspaper editors to endorse a candidate, the way Fox News preys on people who grew up trusting TV news and now have only watched Fox for the last two decades, open lies about who’s eating cats and dogs, a DNC that pushes centrist candidates even after 2016 when the weakness was exposed, and it’s clear that many left-wing voters are wildly unhappy, those are all things that smaller groups have done to help create the situation that we saw yesterday. And that’s just a short list.

      So what I hope we can do, is I hope we can avoid saying something trite like, this is what the American people wanted, full stop. If you want to make that a conversation starter, go for it. But it shouldn’t be a dismissive conversation ender, because it ignores what actually happened and What will continue to happen in the future.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 days ago

        He won the popular vote, but that’s the majority of voters, not the majority of people, right?

        Right, the rest are just so lazy and consumed by apathy that they could not be bothered to vote when THESE were the stakes. I think we can confidently rule them out for any advocacy for our freedom.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    This isn’t sides anymore.

    Until America wants to be tolerant of more than intolerance, it seems it will vote with its penises, wallets, and weapons.

    Edit: unnecessary apostrophe

  • Jimmybander@champserver.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    17 days ago

    America has past the point of no return on education. Anti-intellectualism is the status quo now. It’s only gonna get worse now.

    • x0chi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      They won’t need it… they got people to think what it’s best for them, what books are good or bad, what values you should have, how you should live. And then they will also have chatgpt and AI that will answer their doubts and even do their work cause they won’t be capable of doing it. I wonder if the AI will get “less smart” because of their clients needs being more basic. We’ll see

  • Fester@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    Hope there will be a legitimate election in 2028, and show up to the fucking primary before it and in 2026.

    I think Trump won because of the economy. Yes, he has a rabid base that really does want his fascism, but the voters who pushed him over the edge are ones suffering because inflation and the wealth gap that has just been allowed to increase unimpeded. Those voters don’t want fascism - they’re just dumb AF and don’t pay attention. They just voted for “change.”

    These problems will only increase over the next 4 years, so there will be another opportunity defy the status quo in 2028. We had a chance and failed to do in 2016. We came closer in 2020. We didn’t have a real primary in 2024. When we get to 2028, it’s time to fucking do it.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        17 days ago

        Here’s the thing… He said he would bring change. Biden, and Harris after, both said that things would basically stay the same. For a lot of people, that’s an active issue they’re dealing with everyday.

        The politicians just don’t understand because they haven’t lived like normal people for decades, if ever given the history and family of many of them.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    See, there’s the horrifying possibility that they just did and this is what Americans are.

    Eh, forget it. they probably need a minute before reckoning with that one.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Not being American, I will need some convincing about why the US doesn’t belong in the same bucket as, say, Hungary or Turkey. If you keep self inflicting the rule of strongmen and their oligarch cronies at some point that’s a core feature.

  • Willie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Wait 2 years, and hopefully put people who will mitigate the damage into the positions listed on your ballot. All you can do now as a law abiding citizen is wait.

    • intelisense@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      I fear that the next election will be more ceremony than democracy once they have finished rigging it. At this point, I expect a third term for Trump - if he lives that long.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        17 days ago

        He won’t. The goal was to get Vance in all along. He’s a docile pet for Thiel and co to implement their fascist agenda.

      • Willie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 days ago

        Your fear of a 3rd term makes it all the more important to vote in your future elections. As the two term limit is imposed through a constitutional amendment, they’d need to create another constitutional amendment to reverse it. They need 2/3rds of both the house and the senate to agree to even get the ball rolling, as such, it is vital that you do what you can to prevent them from acquiring those numbers to avoid that situation.

        If it did happen, I wonder if the democrats would run Obama again.

        • intelisense@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          17 days ago

          I don’t think they need a constitutional amendment, just Scotus ruling that it only applies to consecutive terms, for example.

          • Cubes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            I know the supreme Court is heavily biased at the moment, but what possible logic could they use to get out of the 22nd amendment saying “no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice”? They can’t just add words there, and it isn’t ambiguous at all

        • HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          If they attempt to abolish term limits I think we’re actually going to see a civil war.

        • Spraynard Kruger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 days ago

          If Republicans remove term limits, it would be amazing to see Obama instantly get reelected for a third term in 2028.

          That being said, the USA may not get another legitimate election (help us).

          If it did happen, I wonder if the democrats would run Obama again.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    The average death age of any empire is 250 years.

    Tick tock America. You’re proving that figure to be correct.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    They just did. They’ll happily lie in the bed they shat in at first. By the time they realize their mistake, it will be too late.

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 days ago

    Facism is capitalism in decay. America just proved that the decay is rapid.

    Liberal institutions just paved the way for facism to take root.

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 days ago

      I’d like to learn more about

      Facism is capitalism in decay.

      Is that just a think people say or are their studies or books about this?

      • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 days ago

        Facism is a reaction to the institutional failures of capitalism brought about by many scholars. Mainly brought about by the working class left behind looking for a change to the system.

        Places in history where it happened

        italy (1920’s) voters wanted a stronger economy with trains to run on time germany (1920’s) voters wanted a stronger economy without a destabilization of currency

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    Honestly at this point y’all should just get the fuck out. Where to? Anywhere honestly. You’ll probably find the third world preferable to a post project 2025 Murica.

    Russia’s been having a major brain drain issue as all people with functioning brains either have escaped or want to escape the country. I don’t see why Americans should do any different.

      • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        It would.

        But I think that ship has sailed.

        And honestly it might be the third-worlded-accustomed-to-things-being-uttter-bullshit in me. But I think “Winning back the country” is an unrealistic and foolhardy goal. Everyone who is on the radar for being harmed by Trump should look out for themselves and their own. Which includes “getting the fuck out of the country” if that is what it takes.

        Additionally: A significant portion of the country won today. They got exactly what they wanted. And pretending that this neofascism is some kind of external infection is tantamount to covering one’s own ears.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 days ago

          I’d recommend assassination, in Minecraft. If you’re leaving the server and everything is fucked then do one for the team and make some heads roll, in Minecraft. The right used violence and it led to the presidency. A coup was rewarded. Let’s take some notes.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 days ago

          pretending that this neofascism is some kind of external infection is tantamount to covering one’s own ears.

          See, I think it’s mixed. You’re absolutely right that people voted for this. At the same time, years of propaganda by monied interests have led us up to this point. Authoritarianism has been low-key popular at least since the 90s (maybe earlier, but the 90s was when I started school, and learned by experience that fascism is how the school system operates.) People are scared to rock the boat against their “leaders,” and given enough time, this is the result.

          I wish I had time right now to write more about this, because there is some deep psychological manipulation that’s embedded in the fabric of this country. It doesn’t excuse people’s behaviors, but knowing how and why they operate is crucial to understanding the big picture.

          • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 days ago

            At the same time, years of propaganda by monied interests have led us up to this point

            See you’re right but –

            – Those monied interests are also coming from within. The wealthy and powerful from America who see this as a way to consolidate and protect their own wealth and power.

            Silicon Valley wanted Neofascism. Wall Street wanted Neofascism. Fracking Barons like the Koch Brother(s) wanted Neofascism. Some out in the open, like the afore-mentioned Koch(s) and Elon Musk, but make no mistake, every billionaire who “shuts up about politics” is most likely a Neofascist in private, because this benefits them.

            The people in America are heavily propagandised, but that propaganda is funded and developed by and for the benefit of the wealthy within America itself.

            Some people lean really hard into the whole “russian influence” thing because it is comforting. And it is entirely possible that there ARE Russian fingers in this pie – Russia does benefit from a weakened America, in any way they CAN weaken it. Heck, China and the Middle Eastern powers do too, so maybe they have fingers in that pie too.

            But never forget that it started with wealthy Americans, and not some foreign agent. And if every foreign influence walked away, it would continue without them.

            Theoretically, The Revolution™ that lefties like me talk about could change things. Just like theoretically, a peaceful political reform could change things. Theoretically.

            But I’m from the third world. Hopelessness is my bread and butter rice and beans. So I’m entirely accustomed to daydreaming of one day things changing, while expecting elections to change nothing, and knowing for a fact that any attempt at armed fighting would most likely end in a victory for the bad guys (they have the bigger guns).

            The idea of “things are already fucked, have been since before you were born, if you want to make a difference, look out for yourself and those you CAN help, make a difference in the micro, because The System as a macro thing is outside your reach entirely” is in fact how most people have dealt with things since forever, and we survive.

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              It sounds like we’re on the same page. I didn’t mention foreign influence, only monied influence, which is the same thing you’re saying.

              My point was that these influences previously existed in the U.S. long before now. They didn’t materialize out of the blue. Anyone who’s been explicitly anti-fascist prior to the past decade knows that there was already an undercurrent pulling people in that direction.

              I appreciate hearing your perspective, and you’re absolutely on point. One thing I know for sure is that things are going to get a lot worse before they get better.

      • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        This has actually all been a very elaborate “come to Brazil” meme on my part.

        Jokes aside, given how a lot of our people tend to worship the floor 'Murica walks on, if a bunch of refugees from the US came over, they’d probably be welcomed with open arms. :P

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I suppose we shall see. They have a decent agreement with Germany to my knowledge. But only if you want to work on the black market or live on the streets

    • Zacpod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      Come on up to Canada. We’ve been suffering brain drain for ages, and could sure use some scientists and doctors!