I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil. How can they win back the country? Is it too late?

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Americans HAVE their country, this is what they want, this is what they voted for. Stop treating Americans as if this is something pressed upon them. They chose this. Now they will live with the consequences.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Who knows. Apparently half my country is full of legitimately hateful people who just want to watch the people they don’t like suffer.

    How the fuck do we come back from that? Honestly, are we even worth redeeming?

    For me, this is it. This is when America died. If you’re still “proud” to be an American after this, you’re brain-damaged.

  • figjam@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Win it back from who?

    Other Americans who made this choice know who Trump is and thats what they want.

    The Rich have always owned this country. No one is taking anything from them. Its illegal to try.

  • jaxxed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think that first you have to start by admitting two things:

    1. Americans did win their/your election
    2. Americans have l9st faith in their democratic institutions

    After that, you can look at why the Democratic parties fail to appeal to Americans, and try to reform them.

    If you go outside of democracy to gain democracy, then you probably lose what’s left of your democracy.

  • MadBabs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    We radicalize, organize, pour into our communities, support one another, find people already doing the work and join in, and keep fighting like hell.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes. It is too late. This was the inevitable outcome. Sooner or later.

    Dems here are like UK Labor. They’re a right wing party who occasionally cosplays as a left leaning one when they need to. They stand as the bullwark against any form of left wing populism. And they’ve done their job to the letter.

    Our economy is almost entirely debt driven financialization and gambling. There is another subprime mortgage crisis brewing. Exactly the same as the one in '08, except way bigger. And our economy is far more precarious than it was then.

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Regardless of your views on the Orange Grifter / Gift from God (delete as applicable) this question is fundamentally flawed. “How do we build bridges, find common ground and begin to win over our fellow US citizens who have, in my opinion, made a poor and misinformed political choice that could have terrible consequences for them, our country and the world at large?” might be a more appropriate opener. I understand you’re upset, scared, desolate etc but your language comes off as belligerent and aggressive. Perhaps soften your tone and be more receptive to others’ concerns. For the record, I’ve got no flies on this turd as I’m not from the US, nor do I live there. Good luck.

    • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The Republicans are running on a platform of attacking the rights of racial minorities, and the right for trans people to exist

      And the people who vote for them like the pain they cause or are so checked out they don’t know/care

      Idk if there is a way to work with people who’s political agenda is to kill you

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Violence. There will not be a second option.

    Feel free to wait until the camps start, liberals. That will be the “civil” course.

  • Angrywaffle2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    They will over the next 4 years. Elections swing back and forth. Midterms will probably be greatly fir democrats

    • AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, with full control over all 3 branches, fanatacist support groups and a stated desire to overthrow the previous norms and standards in order to build permanent total control, I’m sure the midterms and next election will totally take place and absolutely swing back to the Dems.

      Fucking hell.

  • deafboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Tough question. I don’t think the descendants of european, asian and african settlers are going back home any time soon.

    • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Dam it must have taken you a while to come up with that one.

      That little squirt of dopamine you get when you’re malicious, you know the one you chase like a drug addict? It’s unhealthy and creates a worse world for everyone to live in.

      Stop being a malicious drug addict

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    8 days ago

    Democracy is just the tyranny of the majority.

    I think that most of the Americans want this, even if people on the outside do not understand. So in that sense they are right now winning back their country, as confusing as it might sound.

    • Deadlytosty@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Normally in Democracy the majority or popular vote wins, however due to the electoral college America has, it doesnt necessarily mean the majority voted for the winner. This was the case for Bush, and some other moments in the past.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Whether it’s 48 or 52 % is an immaterial difference. Every other American who voted, voted for Trump. The rest don’t seem to care either way. He has very broad popular assent and is as popular as Harris give or take a margin of error.

        Everyone is lasered-focused on the EC because it makes all the difference for the practicalities, but if one is to make a broad judgement of whether Trump won fair and square the answer is “yeah, mostly”. Further proof is the fact that the House is probably going to be his as well.

        Americans now bear the collective responsibility for the horrors of the next 4(+?) years. Do not make the mistake of blaming the popular will of outright fascism on institutional failures, because institutions didn’t force half of Americans to vote for the fascist, again.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’ll wait 72 hours before settling with it, in case any shenanigans were involved. I expect it’s legitimate, but I want that window open if it’s needed.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        8 days ago

        Trump is winning the popular vote by a pretty decent margin. The electoral college isn’t the issue here.

        • gerbler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          They haven’t finished counting that’s why. Rural areas are faster to count and skew conservative.

          A republican hasn’t won the popular vote in 20 years. Trump is projected to win but like last time he’ll lose the popular vote and win by virtue of the electoral college.

          • Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            8 days ago

            All the projections I’m seeing him show him almost certainly winning the popular vote. There’s a gap of 6 million votes and almost every state is over 90% reported in. That gap is going to likely shrink a bit, but unfortunately it almost certainly won’t be enough for him to even lose the popular vote.

            Lets face it, we’re (assuming you’re american) apparently just a country of facists. It looks like GOP is going to have majority in both houses too so here comes project 2025 I guess.

            • gerbler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Sorry bud, not a yank. You have my sympathies though.

              If it turns out that he does indeed win the popular vote then yeah I’m sorry for your loss. A nest of at least 50% fascists or fascist enablers.

              Heart aches for those that did their civic duty and yet have to suffer the repercussions :(

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            It looks like turnout is way down compared to last election. Trump is pulling about the same amount he did last time ( maybe a few million down, but there are still results to get). Harris is currently down 15M from where Biden was.

            Trump’s support is no larger than it was last time. Harris’ supporters just didn’t show up

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              8 days ago

              Harris’ supporters just didn’t show up

              Anyone who didn’t show up is not a Harris supporter.

          • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Wasn’t he ahead in 2016 around this time, but then once all was said and done he was a few mil behind?

      • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I believe the states responsible for those silly outcomes have since passed laws to prevent it happening again.

        Could be wrong, but I listened to a podcast last week with an American professor who’s pretty much written the book, explaining the history of the Electoral College and how it really works. I’m sure he said those states since fixed those loopholes.

        Either way, the damage is done today. Another four years of stupidity in charge.

        • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          This is not correct. The electoral college is exactly as susceptible to giving the win to the person with fewer votes as it was in 2000 and 2016. It’s also not an issue that’s due to any state in particular and is not an issue that can be solved by individual state action. The NPVIC would fix it but requires the cooperation of many states and is not in effect, and has stalled pretty hard in recent years.

              • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Seriously - the whole thing is such a befuddling mess to us non-Americans.

                How exactly can one win the popular vote but not the actual election? From the outside, the reporting I’ve seen always talks about the faithless elector problem (not in those words - just in describing the problems). Is it more to do with how many votes (electors) each state gets, based on population size?

                • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  That’s it, yes - each state gets as many electoral votes as it has congressmen, including senators. Most states award all of their electoral votes to whoever wins the state, with no proportionality to it at all - only two states (Nebraska and Maine, neither one large) do anything proportional with their votes.

                  With a system like that it’s easier to see how things can end up with the less popular candidate winning - they can, for example, sneak by with 50.1% of the vote in just enough states to win, but bomb it out with 20% of the vote in all the other states. That’s an extreme example specifically for the purpose of illustration, but less extreme versions of that are usually what happens.

                  The electoral votes also aren’t distributed entirely fairly - the number of electoral votes per person tends to be larger for less populated states. The less populated states also tend to be Republican states. So in a very real sense, each person’s vote counts for “more” in those states, and “less” in states with high populations. I don’t believe it’s really possible to fix this problem without vastly increasing the number of electoral votes, but congress currently has its size capped at 535 members for what I consider not very good reasons.

                  Yes, the whole system is trash from the ground up. But much of its structure is defined in the constitution itself, which is very difficult to change.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        u̇nfoṙtcėnetlı, H ſımz t bı ƿinıŋ ð pȯpyulṙ vot æz ƿel.

        spoiler

        Unfortunately, he seems to be winning the popular vote as well.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 days ago

      No, there is a concerted effort by conservatives to use voter suppression to subvert the will of the majority in the US.

      conservatives are clawing back the country right now by hook and by crook.

      can’t go on forever, but I don’t know which is going to last longer: the country or the aging frightened conservatives willing to subvert democracy to hang on to control.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Isn’t just the aging ones sadly. Lots of young people, especially young men, went for Trump. Andrew Tate has taught them well.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          progressive policies are annually more popular and conservative policies and election results like 2016 and 2024 are won mainly by the old guard funding and utilizing their careful network of voting interference and collusion.

          Andrew Tate is a vile exception amongst younger generations, not the rule.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think that most of the Americans want this

      Maybe, but none of the facts directly support this.

      There have been large campaigns to disenfranchise several types of voters for decades in the country. The Electoral College was designed to be unfair to appease Slave states. Voter turnout is abysmal, only about 35% of eligible citizens vote. Out of those turnout is usually around the same percentage. The highest turnout recently was 2020 only because mail in voting was expanded so dramatically, and even then it was only 67% of registered voters, so it was still only 67% of that original 37% of eligible voters. So with the highest recent turnout, we’re looking at about 25% of eligible citizens actually voting.

      • Max@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I believe that the 67% number for the 2020 election is of eligible voters and not registered voters. While turnout is low, it’s not 25% low.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          It was ~67% of eligible voters that were registered to vote. Over 94% of registered voters actually voted.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Dafuk are you talking about? Voter turnout is 67% of all eligible voters. It’s highest since it’s ever been. And Trump won the popular vote. At least look at the facts instead of crying “stolen election”.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      vote against this and save us all from this idiocy.

      Nope. There was just more people lined up to vote for more idiocy. We failed the world. I’d say I’m sorry, but I don’t think that’ll help. This is America.

      America needs to focus on decentralizing power. That way, when the other side wins, they can’t do much damage. Biggest problem America faces is too much centralized control.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Democracy really is the worst form of government, just not as bad as all the others…

      Unfortunately in such polarized times like now, even though majority wants this, the ammount of people for which this is unacceptable is only slightly less than “the majority”. And besides, I believe a big part of “the majority” is just gullible enough to be persuaded they want this while it actually goes against their interests

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        And if the other candidate won, the other half would’ve been in the same state of “this is unacceptable”. Solutions?

        Cuz lemmy seems to think if their party wins it’s all good and if the other wins it’s the end of the world. While in reality it seems there’s a 50-50 split with each side equally hating the other.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          It is the limitation of democracy and why it is the worst (except all the others) - because it allows this.

          How to fix this? These would be a good start: don’t polarize the society like this and create us vs. them mentality. In place of power hungry populists have people in charge who want the best for the country. Don’t enable fascists - they never should make it this far. Respect other people. Invest in education so people understand these basics.

          And this is not just about US. It’s scary that this is wherr us got because they are such a big player on the world stage

          • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            The whole lemmy has been essentially about “us vs them” for the last few months. With zero discourse tolerated, only one opinion being allowed: trump bad, republicans fascist.

            So, if you worry about polarization, you guys are the biggest echo chamber I’ve seen to date.

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s a famous quote. The contradiction is intentional. It means democracy has a lot of problems and often looks terrible. However when you step back and consider the alternatives they are worse.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Take it up with Winston Churchil - I was just paraphrasing his quote.

          The point is democracy is terrible, but we don’t have anything better.