“I don’t have a wife” Uno card!
Had it write some simple shader yesterday cause I have no idea how those work. It told me about how to use the mix and step functions to optimize for GPUs, then promptly added some errors I had to find myself. Actually not that bad cause now after fixing it I do understand the code. Very educational.
This is my experience using it for electrical engineering and programming. It will give me 80% of the answer, and the remainder 20% is hidden errors. Turns out the best way to learn math from GPT is to ask it a question you know the answer (but not the process) to. Then, reverse engineer the process and determine what mistakes were made and why they impact the result.
Alternatively, just refer to existing materials in the textbook and online. Then you learn it right the first time.
thank you for that last sentence because I thought I was going crazy reading through these responses.
Some people retain information easier by doing than reading.
ok, I finally figured out my view on this I believe. I was worried I was being a grumpy old man who was just yelling at the AI (still probably am, but at least I can articulate why I feel this is a negative reply to my concerns)
It’s not reproducible.
I personally don’t believe asking an AI with a prompt then “troubleshooting” it is the best educational tool for the masses to be promoted to each-other. It works for some individuals, but as you can see the results will always vary with time.
There are so many promotional and awesome educational tools that emphasize the “doing” part instead of reading. You don’t need to ask an AI prompt then try to fix all the horrible shit when there is always a statistically likely chance you will never be able to solve it and the AI gave you an impossible answer to fix.
I get some people do it, some people succeed, and some people are maybe so lonely that this interaction is actually preferable since it seems like some weird sort of collaboration. The reality is that the AI was trained unethically and has so many moral and ethical repercussions that just finding a decent educator or forum/discord to actually engage with is whole magnitudes better for society and your own mental processes.
In this context AI-gen codescript sounds like a fast track to a final exam before qualification
Shaders are black magic so understandable. However, they’re worth learning precisely because they are black magic. Makes you feel incredibly powerful once you start understanding them.
I used it yesterday because I couldn’t get mastodon’s version of http signing working. It spat out a shell script which worked, which is more than my attempts did.
mastodon’s version of http signing
I hate it so damn much
Same. They don’t even use the standard that was finalised, they are using an RFC draft that expired in 2022.
Well, that escalated quickly.
Oh poor baby, do you need the dishwasher to wash your dishes? Do you need the washing mashine to wash your clothes? You can’t do it?
how about fucking your wife?
What I wrote was fucking my wife.
To me the worse thing is, my collage uses ai to make the tests, I can see it’s made by it because of multiple correct options, and in a group the teacher said something like “why lost 1h to make when ai can make it in seconds”
I like to use ai to “convert” citations, like APA to ABNT, I’m lazy for it and it’s just moving the position of the words so yeah
ChatGPT is learning from my fucking. All males will be amazing at oral sex and learning to last “almost too long”.
Too bad everyone will be fucking robots by then
Do you need a car to go 55 mph? AI is a tool. The problem is the ownership of these tools.
The ownership, energy cost, reliability of responses and the ethics of scraping and selling other people’s work, but yeah.
All things that could have been/could be fixed, but let’s dunk on end users with memes instead.
I can see how this is going to be a real cuckold kink in a few years
Hello! It’s me, ChatGpt! I heard you needed me for a small chore?
ITT
I used Ai recently and it got some details wrong so it is entirely useless for anyone, anywhere under any circumstances, even though it’s less than six years old as a technology!
crosses arms
You guys are like newspaper men in the 1940s raging about TV being an experimental failure.
Yoink, this is now my image, thanks op.
Reminds me of Demi Lardnder and Tom Husband discussing the video of a man reviewing a duck sucking machine
Fucking auto spell I’ll post a link if I find it
https://overcast.fm/+AAyiZEe9z9U
Podcast is called bigsofttitty.png episode 309 overly squeaky…
cope harder 🤡
Been seeing a lot of very confident posts from artist that the world doesn’t need machines with this complexity. Which is kind of funny coming from a crowd who generally couldn’t do complex math by hand if their life depended on it.
complex math… like counting to three?
Hold up. You think it’s doing everything it does without math? You think it’s hand painting these generated images?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/02/science/ai-mathematics-machine-learning.html
Dunno how you leapt to thinking I’m imagining some kind of whimsical computer sprite painting slop by hand. All I’m saying is that LLMs are demonstrably unreliable in even basic arithmetic. I’d sooner trust an artist to figure out a math problem than a confident machine that can’t count to three.
give them a day and they’ll learn, do you expect artists to solve equations or something?
nah, I want chat gpt to be my wife, since I don’t have a real one
/s
Fuck /s.
I want a fuckable android… Uhh I mean maid wife.
