• LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    19 days ago

    If I remember correctly, the reason text messages were 140 characters was because cell phone data included 140 characters of unused space. So, beyond the implementation, there was virtually zero cost to the providers. And they charged per message.

    • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      19 days ago

      Basically, yes. In the olden days, cell phones sent a ping at least once a minute to the nearest tower, and sometimes more often. The tower would respond with a similar message. There was a 140 character field in the ping that could be used for a variety of diagnostics and network controls. That field was also used for text messaging and so was pretty much free for the providers, other than the very small amount of general network backhaul overhead of sending that message to another phone. Charging for texts was a hell of a rip off.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    It helps to think before hitting Send.

    God, I hate those people who send off half a text, then a correction, then the other half, all within 5 seconds.

  • Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    19 days ago

    In Europe, they kept this up even after most users had smartphones. And that’s why WhatsApp is so successful there.

    • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 days ago

      Same in many other places. Around 2015, I remember recharging with a prepaid package that gave me 100 messages/day. (I think it was like ₹10/day). I used to save from my lunch money so that I could text my then gf. Man, I was so happy when she finally got a smartphone.

  • specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    19 days ago

    I just refused to have texting back then. I worked for a phone company around that time and the bullshit they would charge for drove me crazy.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    19 days ago

    Moreso than you know. IIRC, cell phones had to constantly ping towers for service, and there was unused space in the packets for the pings, hence the 140 character limit. SMS simply piggybacked on the existing ping at no extra transmission cost to the carrier.

    • sartalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 days ago

      This is pretty close.

      There was absolutely zero hit to their bandwidth for texts. Other than getting the software in place for it to work, there was almost no cost to them whatsoever.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yep, an engineer in the late 80’s said “hey, look at all this empty space in the management frames”… Frames that are continually sent when there’s a connection, because it’s a frame-based system. The space in the frames just happened to be… 144 characters worth.

      Of course today SMS has to be simulated on 5G because it doesn’t work like the CDMA based stuff (just like GSM had to do).

      God I hate SMS. It’s old, it’s bad, it’s unreliable (both in practice and technically).

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        SMS is still a lifesaver when you need to communicate with people who don’t have a reliable data connection.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          The problem is that SMS isn’t reliable.

          It has no error detection or correction. It’s best-effort. There’s not even validation between handset and tower. The phone encapsulates the message in the frames and sends them, assuming they arrive at the tower.

          It’s like shouting into a room and assuming the person got your message.

          If connectivity is spotty, then SMS is spotty - and you have no idea if the other person didn’t receive your message.

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            It’s not really like that anymore on the newer networks… Back 15 years ago, sure you’d miss texts or get them 4 days late, but I can’t recall the last time a text went AWOL

          • kungen@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            Huh, even when you enable “SMS delivery reports”? If someone’s phone is off and I SMS them, I get one checkmark, and once they’re online again it gets two.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      I mean, even if the constant ping was every minute. Back in the 2000s, some younings were sending texts multiple times a minute. So they did need more bandwidth.

      Also, was receiving also part of the ping?

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        The ping was constantly. It’s what registered the phone on the network and routed calls. If you called a phone it didn’t know it was being called until the next ping cycle - so it was happening a few times a second.

  • Law Abiding VPN User@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 days ago

    my plan was 25 cents for every text

    that was so shitty. and we only had like…600 minutes to share among 6 people and we were paying over $800 a month for the whole plan. Back then you could feed a whole family at a fast food restaurant for like $6

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 days ago

    See also: the way I use the internet.

    Playing Ultima Online on pay by the minute dial up when i still lived at home had my dad rightfully apoplectic every time the bill arrived 😬😄

  • Soggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 days ago

    My first plan cost me 25 cents to send or receive and you bet your ass I collected that from any friend that texted me stupid shit.

  • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 days ago

    The only way to keep that shit on lockdown was with prepaid cards. Can’t go nuts with texting if your phone stops receiving texts after you go through the $10/25/whatever you put on there

    • noodlejetski (he/him)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 days ago

      wow (send)

      you’re definitely not my coworker (send)

      who’s unable to complete (send)

      a single sentence (send)

      in our group chat (send)

      without breaking it into ten to twenty (send)

      messages (send)

      I used to have an app installed that let me set up rules for notifications, so that whenever a notification with their name in the header would arrive, it would mute the conversation for the next 5 minutes, because otherwise my watch would vibrate for a minute or two straight.