• Dharma Curious@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Texas does not have a monopoly on y’all. Y’all is collective, both as a noun, and as ownership. Y’all is Southern for Comrade.

      • escapesamsara@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ya’ll better watch out now y’hear? We don take kindly to that kind’a hate speech ‘round these parts. Equal weight beans and beef, you skimp out either and yain’t fixin’ chili; you might’ina even be inclined to leave for everyone’s sake.

      • SolarNialamide@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Where in the world do you not put beans in chili? That’s literally the point of chili. Is this an American thing I’m too European to understand?

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Chili involves 2 things: Chilis and beef. Much in the idea of molé sauce, you can get a lot of complexity from chili powder alone.

        • Rambi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve also heard them say tomatoes shouldn’t be added to chilli as well

          • x3n0s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            As a Texan, this is true. Traditional chili is based on the Mexican “chili con carne,” meaning “chilies with meat.”

            Chili normally is a stew with 1 inch cubes of a tougher meat like chuck steak that’s been stewed down until tender in a liquid (water or beef stock, sometimes even beer or coffee added) and a puree of reconstituted dried chiles (not chili powder) and other spices. Nothing else goes into traditional Texan chili. Beans are sometimes served on the side though. Adding beans is perceived as a cheap filter and skimping out on the meat.

            This is the dish that started all of these other non-mexican versions of chili and you’re missing out of you’ve never had it!

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m southern with family from Louisiana, Texas and Arkansas and chili is all about the beans. I call chili with chiles, beans and tomatoes “Chili” and if I make it with beans, chiles, tomatoes and meat (stew meat never hamburger) “Meat Chili”. Would take chili with beans & corn over chili without beans any day of the week.

          Chili with hamburger without beans is something to put on a hot dog or bun. Not a meal, it’s like hamburger helper nonsense.

          ETA: this is not to say I’ve never made stew meat in Chile sauce. Cubed brisket finished in sauce of anchos and tomatillos is heavenly. I just never call that chili.

          • root_beer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Being a yank scumbag, I clearly don’t help your argument but

            Chili with hamburger without beans is something to put on a hot dog or bun. Not a meal, it’s like hamburger helper nonsense.

            is how I’ve always seen it.

            Goddamn, some o’ y’inz need fiber.

  • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I refuse to accept Texas’ claim on y’all. Its a word collectively owned by everyone south of the mason-dixon line and I will fight to the death over this.

    Signed, floridaman

    • Intralexical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      …Am I not allowed to use “y’all”, north of the 49th parallel? Do we have to bring back “thou” so “you” can be plural again? Or is this part of the Quebecois plot to force everyone to parler en français donc nous pouvons utiliser “vous”? C’est bien, anyway, j’suppose.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fun fact:

        “Thou” and “you” were the same word.

        The “th” sound used to have its own character in written English called the thorn. When typefaces came along, it was excluded and sometimes replaced with a “y.”

        Also why “Ye” and “The” are the same.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it bad that I’m more bothered by “j’suppose” than the inclusion of “anyway”?

        • Intralexical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          C’est un trait quebecois, je pense… les cowboys fringants la dit (“anyway”), donc je ne sais, c’est probablement ok… J’ai entendu “j’suppose” avant aussi, vraiment, je pense…? Est-ce que ça n’est pas comme “I’spose” en anglais? Reverso a beaucoup des examples pour “j’suppose”, quand même. (Je ne suis pas quebecois ou francophone, si tu ne peut pas voir pour quelque raison; je suis un idiot anglophone.)

          • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “I’spose” est facile. “J’suppose” est dur à dire, parce qu’on ne peut pas dire “j’s” comme “i’s”.

            J’ai dû sortir mon français rouillé. Merci pour la pratique. Et oui, j’ai utilisé Google.

            • Intralexical@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              “I’spose” est facile. “J’suppose” est dur à dire, parce qu’on ne peut pas dire “j’s” comme “i’s”.

              Eh, je ne sais. C’est plus difficile que “I’spose”, oui, mais je pense que c’est ok… Les cowboys fringants dit aussi “j’te”, “j’rentre”, et probablement les autres consonnes aussi, donc, généralement, je l’imagine comme si on bredouille un peu.

              J’ai dû sortir mon français rouillé. Merci pour la pratique. Et oui, j’ai utilisé Google.

              Et la même à toi! Mais j’utilise Google pour traduire du français vers l’anglais, après avoir premièrement écrit la français avec Collins et quelquefois Reverso (mon professeur français a toujours aimé ça). Je fais des corrections alors peut-être. Ainsi, Google me dit si j’ai fait des grosses erreurs, mais je pratique mon français tout seul.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, I’m doing my best to import it into the New Zealand vernacular, we are South of the 49th.

        So, uh, I dunno.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can use yall but the "L"s are quieter the further north you go such that they’re silent near the border

        “How ya doin” is simply plural above the 49th

    • ilex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Everyone gets y’all. It fills the dumb gap in English where the plural of you is you. Now if we could only get a singular neutral 3rd for people that isn’t also the plural.

      E: Or we could start pronouncing They singular like latchkey, for a thee sound. So we can get fun words like they’s (thees). It will also make English even more confusing for newbies. What’s not to love?

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the plural of goose is geese, then the plural of moose is meese.

        I approve of this message, are y’all with me?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      So long as we can still claim “Y’all’d’nt’ve”

      It’s our greatest contribution to the lexicon and extremely efficient.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also second person plural (or singular), second person is always ungendered.

      First and second person, plural and singular are never gendered: I, you, we, you / y’all / all y’all. The only pronouns that are gendered are the third person singular: he / she / it. Third person plural (they) is also ungendered.

      • FunctionFn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The most common form (at least where I’m from) of second person plural behind “you all (y’all)” is gendered: “you guys”. It’s used in an ungendered way increasingly commonly, but “guy” is still gendered to plenty of English speakers.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Guys” is sometimes gendered, sometimes not. There really isn’t a female-gendered equivalent to “you guys”. You could say something like “you gals”, but that’s just not used. Most often you could say “could you guys follow me?” to a group of women and nobody would think twice about it.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone who grew up in North Carolina, I agree. Texas might be the first thing some people think of when it comes to “southern” states, but it doesn’t get exclusive claim to the quirks of the whole region

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have never thought of Texas as southern (yes, I know they’re the south-most state). Western movies were in Texas, so Texas is western (don’t judge my very clearly faulty logic). South Carolina is south for sure. Georgia. Mississippi and Alabama are no brainers. But Texas? That’s where western cowboys live… sorry… cowyalls.

  • nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “You” is also ungendered. There seems to be a common idea that English is missing a second person plural. We have one, it’s “you”. We just stopped using the second person singular. That’s what all those variations of “thee, thou, thy” etc were.

    “Y’all” would be a superpluralization. If that’s still not enough we also have the ultraplural form of, “all y’all”

    • pythonoob@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Y’all is exclusive. All y’all is inclusive.

      If I walk into a party in a house and a group of my friends are there and I say ‘what are y’all doing here?’, I’m only talking to my friends.

      If I walk into my own house and there’s a party there and I say ‘what are all y’all doing here?’ I’m addressing everyone of the hoodlums in my house.

      Edit: To the person who down voted yet contributed nothing to the convo, please feel obliged to read up on clusivity in linguistics.

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was one of the downvotes. Clusivity, as described in your article does not apply to y’all. It’s You All…it will never include the speaker.

        It’d have to be something like w’all to apply.

      • Art35ian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We’re very inclusive in Australia also.

        ‘G’day you bunch of cunts’ means hello to everyone male, female, known and unknown.

        We’re very polite over here.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Getting pressed enough about a single downvote to make an edit is cringe.

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. We mostly think of grammatical number as a simple choice of singular vs plural but that’s not what we do in real life.

        We generally have multiple labels that describe the concept of progressively expanding circles of what’s included when we think of ourselves.

        There’s the very narrow sense of I/me/myself. We have various expansions around us/all’y’all. Jamaicans have the phrase “I and I” which focuses on the individual but explicitly calls out the connection with others.

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds right.
        Presumably “y’all’s” would be the second person superplural possessive.

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We also have “Ya’” where we elide the entire ending and you need to determine plural vs singular from context. For example, “Ya’ can’t get thea, les’ ya been there befoa.”

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s why conservatives have started to say yim’all and yer’all in order needlessly gender the expression. Can’t believe these folks sometimes.

    Edit: 😂

          • callouscomic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            North Carolina once outlawed State officials mentioning or acknowledging climate change exists, to the detriment of their own coastal cities. We could also discuss bathrooms if you want. I think NC ought not be pointing fingers about who is better.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              North Carolina is only the way it is because of ridiculous gerrymandering so perhaps we shouldn’t be negative and discouraging of people who want it to be better

            • pixel_witch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              While true there are some groups people and politicians are trying to make it be better and change things like that. I can’t think of anyone in SC that is doing that (though I admit I don’t keep up with their politics outside broad nationwide headlines)

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well I DID add “or at least the least awful one”. I know that NC is far from perfect, with some instances of truly horrid policies, but compared to SC it’s almost downright progressive lol

          • jasondj@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I went to South Carolina once. For the eclipse a few years ago.

            We flew into Charlotte, stayed there for a night, then Greenville SC for a night (to be in totality), and back to Charlotte for a couple of days.

            Crossing the border from NC to SC was less like crossing state lines and more like crossing the DMZ or the Berlin Wall. Just…a totally different word on the other side of that line.

            Best part was that I got to try out cheer wine. Also there was a guy in front of me at the concession stand (we saw the eclipse from the Greenville Zoo) on the phone with someone. He was trying to tell that person he was in the “food line” but the other person kept hearing “Food Lion”, the name of a local grocery chain.

            Although a couple of different guys saw me sweating my ass off in the zoo and offered me a “cool rag”. I had no idea what that was and it sounded disgusting so I politely declined…but in retrospect I have to appreciate their hospitality.

            Next eclipse, I’m going to Austin.

  • Vaginal_blood_fart@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s actually a contraction from old English or Scots and has been around since 1631. The hicks are using socialist words that aren’t theirs.

  • ilex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    y’all is second person plural. First and Second person aren’t gendered. Therefore, I is also woke

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      OMG yes! We must make this a thing, make the right speak in caveman to fit their troglodyte nature! Lol

  • mycroft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Y’all is the best pronoun.

    It’s second person can be used singular or plural, and the difference is all contextual.

    It’s ungendered and it’s makes almost anything feel “more fun.”

  • gongonzabarfarbin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Y’all Texans can go to hell for trying to claim y’all.

    • Signed a Louisianan

    P.s. your El Paso 857 sign can go right to hell too.

  • YoFrodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    the oldest published “Y’all” was from Richmond Virginia in 1856 in the Southern Literary Messenger