• bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is the correct way IMO. “Uploading” your mind to a computer is making a clone/copy, but the original dies the same.

    • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maintaining continuity of consciousness is the only thing that would make me feel comfortable with converting myself to a machine intelligence.

      • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hate to break it to you, but our meat brains don’t even have continuity of consciousness. We become unconscious all the time. The only real constant is the “hardware” our consciousness emerges from, but even that is always changing.

        • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t get the down votes. Did y’all forget about sleep? No one vividly dreams every night all night long. Often it’s the fade to black going to sleep then the sudden awakening.

            • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              Obviously not, but what is the functional difference? If you can’t tell it’s happening, does it actually matter?

                • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Sorry, should have been more specific. If you died in your sleep every night and came back to life in the morning, and you couldn’t tell it was happening, would it matter?

                  It’s not a question with a right answer, I just want to hear your thoughts about it

      • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        What does maintaining continuity of consciousness look like to you? As in you are able to talk to your copy? And continue to live your normal life outside while your digital self lives their digital life?

        Or are you saying you want the transition to digital to be seamless, where your digital self remembers laying in a chair, a quick pin-prick, and then they’re in the digital realm?

        Keep in mind, we have zero understanding of how you’d get the meat consciousness to transition into the digital consciousness - it’s likely not even possible. The two options for copying are keep both alive or terminate the original somewhere before bringing the digital one online. There’s many ways to do both, but those are the two.

    • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the only way we know it is us for sure is if we are conscious in both the original and clone at the same time. Like… okay… I know this is me in the new brain, I’ll shut down the other one.

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Like… okay… I know this is me in the new brain, I’ll shut down the other one.

        the other one: i’m pretty sure you’ve got it backwards, pal

        • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, no… you misunderstood. We’re just taking a trip to the brain farm up north. You’ll be able to think with the other brains up there. It’ll be fun.

    • nul9o9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree.

      But here is an interesting thing to think about:

      What is the perceived difference between falling asleep and waking up the next day, vs going to sleep and copying your consciousness to a machine/new body.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Some sleep is conscious (dreaming) but they’re easily forgotten. Perhaps being unconscious still always has a grain of consciousness (but is just forgotten).

        It seems there is a grain of reduced experience while sleeping. Copying seems to imply it’s always a clone (a different ego, a different person).

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The body. It’s feeding you vast amounts of information every moment, it’s the one making decisions, you’re the AI assistant providing analysis and advice

        If you clone a tree, you get a similar tree. The branches aren’t in the same place. If you clone a human, why would the nerves be laid out the same way? Even if it’s wired up correctly, without a lifetime of cooperation why would your body take your advice?

        Imagine you wake up. Red looks blue. Everything feels numb. The doctor says “everything looks good, why don’t you try to stand up?”. You want to cooperate with the doctor, but you don’t stand up. You could move, but you don’t. Rationalizing your choices, you tell the doctor you don’t feel like it. You feel your toes, you shift to get away from the prodding of your doctor, but you just can’t muster the will to stand

        Imagine you wake up. Your sight is crystal clear, you feel your body like never before. The doctor says “don’t move yet”. With the self control of a child, you rip out the itchy IV to get the tape off of you. The doctor says something in a stem tone, and you’re filled with rage. You pummel the doctor, then are filled with regret and start to cry

        Emerging science suggests this kind of situation could lead to brand new forms of existential horror

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    3 months ago

    As long as it’s made mandatory to cover with insurance so it’s available to everyone. The last thing we need is an immortal ruling class.

    • Vieric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Don’t worry, going by past history this will be available to any and…uhh, [checks notes] oh, uh-oh.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh at this point it seems like we’re treating dystopian science fiction as a guidebook instead of a warning.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Hold on, what color Soylent are we talking about? Is it the delicious, definitely only plants, green flavor?

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale Tech

          Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don’t Create The Torment Nexus

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Let the death of Saburo Arasaka be a lesson to us all: even 150+ year old bastards can get choked the fuck out

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        … and reduce emissions by wasting the rest. But due to negative selection leading into that upper class they won’t be able to manage the planet further despite thinking that they can and will die of hunger eventually.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        If they’re functional, and we get serious about space or birth control, then no it’s not a problem. But that is another path we can take to really juice the dystopia.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It will take a very long time indeed before we can reach another habitable planet enough to alleviate an exponentially growing population, and forced birth control will be unpopular, not to mention probably employed as eugenics by those in power against those who aren’t.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            There’s always orbital habitats. They ramp up a lot quicker than even a Mars colony.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Eh, it would be worth it with the right recreational activities up there and knowing we weren’t setting up altered carbon.

                • realitista@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You’d have zero control over your existence. Someone else would own that station and you’d exist entirely at their whim. They would decide if you get food, air, water, shelter. No real access to nature. I’d rather die.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    We don’t need immortal billionaires sucking up everyone’s oxygen.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you haven’t, you should watch and/or read Altered Carbon.

      If you choose to watch, it is my opinion that it’s primarily the first season that’s worth watching.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well the “not having extreme longevity” doesn’t seem to function, they are here anyways.

  • ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good lord, just let people DIE. Imagine what a rotten place this would be if people with outdated mindsets continued to control the world decades or even centuries after their expiration dates. People were already angry about 80 year old presidential candidates… what happens when they’re 120, or 150?

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I doubt it. They will just dump shit further away. If their solution default is to make things “somebody else’s problem” there’s no reason to believe they will stop thinking that way.

        • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That might be their outlook on “local” pollution for a while, but you don’t think going from 20 years left to centuries to live might affect their opinions on global climate change?

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not really. Many of them are already heavily invested in life extension tech (not that I think it will work, but it means they’re optimistic). I think their general worldview is that technology will fix it, at least for them.

      • DeanFogg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They can live forever but have to trade their fortune for it permanently

  • casmael@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    FROM THE MOMENT I UNDERSTOOD THE WEAKNESS OF MY FLESH IT DISGUSTED ME

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are two reasons he believes the neocortex could be replaced, albeit only slowly. The first is evidence from rare cases of benign brain tumors, like a man described in the medical literature who developed a growth the size of an orange. Yet because it grew very slowly, the man’s brain was able to adjust, shifting memories elsewhere, and his behavior and speech never seemed to change—even when the tumor was removed.

    That’s proof, Hébert thinks, that replacing the neocortex little by little could be achieved “without losing the information encoded in it” such as a person’s self-identity.

    The second source of hope, he says, is experiments showing that fetal-stage cells can survive, and even function, when transplanted into the brains of adults. For instance, medical tests underway are showing that young neurons can integrate into the brains of people who have epilepsy and stop their seizures.

    “It was these two things together—the plastic nature of brains and the ability to add new tissue—that, to me, were like, ‘Ah, now there has got to be a way,’” says Hébert.

    Very interesting. I’ve also seen research suggesting that the application of stem cells to damaged neural tissue within the spinal cord could repair it, so the idea that you could use a similar approach to actual brain health isn’t such a big leap. But still, wow. I wonder how long it would take for the immature cells to develop into “adult mode” that’s fully integrated into the patients cortex. In order to replace the entire brain, you’d have to do it in like, 8 parts, with years of recovery time in between each surgery. Also there would exist the potential for the new cells to develop into like, a second, smaller brain, if the connections sour or if the new material isn’t stimulated the “right” way.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    The brain renewal concept could have applications such as treating stroke victims

    If this can restore functions to stroke victims again, it’s absolutely amazing.
    If this is vastly successful which remains to be seen, there might be a path format to the longevity part of the idea.

  • icerunner_origin@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am not renting my corporeal existence from a megacorporation. There is no way this is ever affordable to the masses without some pretty huge caveats