• Gork@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    299
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    You know what’ll also protect the children? Releasing the Epstein files.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    republicans suing republican donors you love to see it

    it also means dick since xvideos is french and headquartered in the czech republic

  • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    1 month ago

    Meanwhile Nascar literally has races sponsored by BlueChew and every other fucking ad during a race is for bent dick disease, all on easily accessed channels.

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 month ago

    Girls gone wild!?!? What are they making 12 year olds verify their age to jack it to infomercials at 3am?

  • Sheridan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Probably a dumb question, but if the website servers aren’t physically located in Florida, why must the websites follow Florida law?

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      State prosecution argues if there’s access in Florida, the site must follow their laws. These sites need to georestrict access and should have done it the day law went into effect.

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This is like me saying I have a bucket of books that are illegal in your state but legal in mine. You come to my state and take the books back to yours. Who broke the law?

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          50
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Good luck trying to find any rational in these legislations, there is none. I can still search for “sexy naked sex” and get thousands of explict image results from google in FL. The laws are not protecting kids, but they are embarrassing legal aged adults and putting sites and creators that previously tried to cooperate out of business.

          Edit - hell, the fact reddit and X are somehow exempt should say everything. Sites that kids would visit for totally non-explicit purposes and end up exposed to top trending titties.

        • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          Easier to target the few dozen major sources than the millions of users for now. But I agree wholeheartedly with the premise. They’re not setting up a shop in Florida. They’re in entirely different places around the world and Floridians are virtually knocking on their door and taking their digital packages with them back to Florida. Why would the onus be on the server to police the laws local to each client?

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well that’s a really bad example you gave because gun laws explicitly cover that exact case federally. This is more like book banning. Books are banned in your state, not mine, you come and buy them here and take them back there.

          • Ageroth@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Or fireworks. Many states have laws against selling fireworks to state residents, but all you need to do is cross a border or have an out of state license and you can buy them just fine.

          • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Don’t request shit you aren’t allowed to have. My state doesn’t ban me from sending it to you, yours bans you from having it. Tf do I care about your state laws. I don’t live there.

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because they’re serving users in Florida, so they must abide by laws relating to servicing customers there.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d argue it’s on the state to figure that out (for better or worse). My site is on a globally connected network, if you don’t want your citizens doing something, you figure it out. It’s not my job.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      They conduct business in Florida. Their customers aren’t porn watchers, but people who buy ad space. They could stop selling ads in Florida, but they won’t.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      the companies/sites itself can block the site from being acessed from florida though if they choose. yea if it accesible from florida, they have to follow the legislation there.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        29 days ago

        yea if it accesible from florida, they have to follow the legislation there

        Why?

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        block the site from being acessed from florida though if they choose

        How? I do not think we know of a reliable way, DNS blocking get bypassed by alternative DNS ( and ISP probably do not have per state DNSes) , IP blocking get bypassed via VPN, etc. They can say they did put in place something but it is like puttimg a fence without walls around, it is just symbolic.

  • haloduder@thelemmy.clubBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    30 days ago

    Meanwhile, Robin L. Rosenberg of the Southern District of Florida is the judge that blocked the release of the Epstein files.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Time to start small-time porn groups.
    Ask your friends for their nudes.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    30 days ago

    Two problems here.
    One is jurisdiction. If the website is not incorporated in Florida, has no offices in Florida, and does not use Florida servers, why should they be subject to Florida law? Everything they do is completely legal in their home jurisdiction.
    This sort of enforcement is basically impossible on the internet. If anybody can access any website from anywhere, how is the website supposed to keep up with hundreds or thousands of changing jurisdictions each with their own legal requirements? And why should they have to?

    Second is interstate commerce clause of the Constitution. It reserves to the federal government the right to regulate interstate commerce. I would think that demanding that a out of state business change its business practices would fall afoul of that.

    Now it could be argued that since the website advertises in Florida and accepts sign ups from Florida residents, that they do business in Florida. However the simple solution there would be to disable payment for Florida residents.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      30 days ago

      In 2018 SCOTUS ruled that states can require businesses with no physical presence or relationship to a state to collect sales tax for the state, effectively invalidating the Constitution’s Interstate Commerce Clause. Florida may be hoping this precedent along with a corrupt, illegitimate fascist majority in SCOTUS, will allow states to project their own local laws onto the entire country.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      If the customers are still in Florida and they still earn money in Florida, they are still subject to Florida law.

      The way they handle conflicting requirements in different regions is to use regional flags. It’s quite simple and it’s been done for a long time in more tightly regulated fields like e.g. online shopping.

      If it’s legal to sell weed online in some areas and illegal in others, you can’t just say “Well, our servers are in a region where it’s legal so we send weed all over the world.”

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        Wait, wouldn’t it be legal for a country with legal weed to send it, just illegal go receive it in a jurisdiction where it’s illegal? Like if I lived in the Netherlands I couldn’t be arrested for mailing it to the US, but it’d get stopped at the border.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      30 days ago

      Because they offer their services to people living in Florida.

      Same reason as to why you should include VAT on your prices if you sell to EU citizens

  • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is disgusting. Does anyone have a list of sites so I can block them all right now?

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      It’s in the title lol. Also new ones pop-up daily especially international ones. Use Bing to find the videos then see the domain they’re hosted at and go from there. When searching bing, put xxx in the search as well and turn off the safesearch bs.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    29 days ago

    Republicans so fuckin’ stupid they’re trying prohibition again, but this time with porn.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      “… and more.”

      Þey should enforce age verification to look at DeSantis’ stupid face.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        His face is probably the most offensive thing in Florida, at least when a certain someone isn’t at Mar-a-Lago…

        (Also: nice thorn!)

          • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            True, but apparently the attempt to resurrect its use uses it for both the voiced and unvoiced dental fricatives where current English usage uses ‘th’ rather than resurrecting both characters.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              29 days ago

              then what’s the point… it complicates things further by specifically using a character that has a single sound to replace two different sounds instead of using th which everyone knows has two different sounds.

              would be better to just come up with a good th ligature.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    If these companies wanted to spin up a lobbying and PR group, they would have huge reach.

    Which would cause other problems down the line, but they’d crush this particular problem.